Skip to content

docs(proposals): phase 2 reviewer persistence and reviewer graph - #114

Merged
JOY (JOY) merged 1 commit into
devfrom
claude/laughing-keller-9jsp5v
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

JOY (JOY) merged 1 commit into
devfrom
claude/laughing-keller-9jsp5v

Conversation

@JOY

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • What changed? Adds Docs/Proposals/2026-10-16-reviewer-graph-phase2.html, a proposal for the owner to review. It covers:
    • Two private tables (rate.reviewers, rate.review_reviewer, service_role only) to persist the reviewer data that feat(reviews): reviewer metadata contract + real reviewer signals; fix /merchants row truncation #113 and DOS/Rate-Services#17 now extract.
    • A rate.merchant_list_stats() RPC so /merchants stops paging every product and review.
    • The reviewer-graph signals these enable (co-review rings, shop concentration, rating skew), gated on a labelled evaluation set.
    • The REVIEWER_KEY_SECRET the scraper now requires before it produces reviewer keys.
  • Why? Reviewer data currently lives only for one crawl, so the same account cannot be linked across products. That link is the strongest seeding signal. The schema change belongs in DOS.Me and needs owner approval first.

Refs #112

Checklist

  • Build passes: n/a (docs only)
  • Type-check passes: n/a
  • Lint/format: HTML parses; no em/en dashes
  • Tests pass: n/a
  • Docs updated
  • No breaking API changes

Notes

  • No migration is applied by this PR. The SQL in the proposal is a sketch for the DOS.Me PR, which follows only after approval.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01SJ8kEoAgmss5ZwS8ziunTj


Generated by Claude Code

Proposal for JOY: two private tables (rate.reviewers, rate.review_reviewer)
and a merchant aggregate RPC via a DOS.Me migration, the graph signals they
enable, and the REVIEWER_KEY_SECRET the scraper now requires.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SJ8kEoAgmss5ZwS8ziunTj
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the docs label Oct 16, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 43 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 810e342b-8e7e-425f-900c-14676aedce68
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38fa019 and 1cd238a.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1
  • Docs/Proposals/2026-10-16-reviewer-graph-phase2.html
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@JOY
JOY (JOY) merged commit c6b90b5 into dev Oct 16, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants