Skip to content

fix(remote-config): Expose HttpClientCapability in remote config#2252

Open
bwoebi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bob/rc-native-client
Open

fix(remote-config): Expose HttpClientCapability in remote config#2252
bwoebi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bob/rc-native-client

Conversation

@bwoebi

@bwoebi bwoebi commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As a side-effect, this fixes the missing timeout on the remote config body awaiting.

@bwoebi
bwoebi requested review from a team as code owners July 17, 2026 16:53
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 4650 documentation warning(s) found

📦 datadog-sidecar - 2809 warning(s)

📦 libdd-capabilities-impl - 190 warning(s)

📦 libdd-remote-config - 657 warning(s)

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 994 warning(s)


Updated: 2026-07-17 18:02:36 UTC | Commit: faebbd4 | missing-docs job results

@bwoebi bwoebi changed the title Expose HttpClientCapability in remote config fix(remote-config): Expose HttpClientCapability in remote config Jul 17, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 10 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 datadog-sidecar - 4 error(s)

Show output
error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:37:1
   │
37 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Invalid pointer dereference in `fmt::Pointer` impl for `Atomic` and `Shared` when the underlying pointer is invalid
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:90:1
   │
90 │ crossbeam-epoch 0.9.18 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Affected versions of `fmt::Display` dereference the underlying pointer. This causes a invalid pointer dereference e.g., when a pointer created with `Atomic::null` or `Shared::null`. `fmt::Debug` impls and pre-0.9 `fmt::Display` impls, which do not dereference pointers, are not affected by this issue.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1276
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.9.20 (try `cargo update -p crossbeam-epoch`)
   ├ crossbeam-epoch v0.9.18
     └── crossbeam-deque v0.8.5
         └── rayon-core v1.12.1
             └── rayon v1.10.0
                 └── criterion v0.5.1
                     ├── (dev) datadog-ipc v0.1.0
                     │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
                     ├── libdd-common v5.1.0
                     │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
                     │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
                     │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
                     │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
                     │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
                     │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   ├── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0
                     │   │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0
                     │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
                     │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0
                     │   │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0
                     │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
                     │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0
                     │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v37.0.0
                     │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0
                     │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.1.0
                     │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:302:1
    │
302 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by [@lopopolo](https://github.com/lopopolo)) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-common v5.1.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0
      │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.1.0
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:395:1
    │
395 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      ├── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
                  ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
                  └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-capabilities-impl - 1 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:68:1
   │
68 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by [@lopopolo](https://github.com/lopopolo)) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v5.1.0
         └── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-remote-config - 2 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:93:1
   │
93 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by [@lopopolo](https://github.com/lopopolo)) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v5.1.0
         ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
         │   └── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0
         │       └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
         └── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:137:1
    │
137 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0
          └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 3 error(s)

Show output
error[vulnerability]: Invalid pointer dereference in `fmt::Pointer` impl for `Atomic` and `Shared` when the underlying pointer is invalid
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:65:1
   │
65 │ crossbeam-epoch 0.9.18 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Affected versions of `fmt::Display` dereference the underlying pointer. This causes a invalid pointer dereference e.g., when a pointer created with `Atomic::null` or `Shared::null`. `fmt::Debug` impls and pre-0.9 `fmt::Display` impls, which do not dereference pointers, are not affected by this issue.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1276
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.9.20 (try `cargo update -p crossbeam-epoch`)
   ├ crossbeam-epoch v0.9.18
     └── crossbeam-deque v0.8.5
         └── rayon-core v1.12.1
             └── rayon v1.10.0
                 └── criterion v0.5.1
                     ├── libdd-common v5.1.0
                     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
                     │   │   ├── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0
                     │   │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
                     │   │   ├── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
                     │   │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
                     │   │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
                     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:202:1
    │
202 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by [@lopopolo](https://github.com/lopopolo)) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v5.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:273:1
    │
273 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── libdd-remote-config v2.0.0
          ├── (dev) libdd-remote-config v2.0.0 (*)
          └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-07-17 18:03:26 UTC | Commit: faebbd4 | dependency-check job results

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipelines  Tests

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 2 Pipeline jobs failed

semver-check | semver-check   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

Required checks pass | allchecks   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 98.68%
Overall Coverage: 74.66% (+0.03%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 39d4b97 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1 datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The body_bytes = response.into_body() change is correct: HttpClientCapability::request returns http::Response<bytes::Bytes> with the body fully buffered inside NativeHttpClient, so no further .collect().await is needed. All 24 existing unit tests pass, covering the full fetch pipeline through a local mock HTTP server. The timeout fix is legitimate — the body collection is now inside the timed future, closing a real hang risk in the old code.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

📊 Validated against 24 scenarios · Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 36072ea · What is Autotest? · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 36072ea7cf

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

impl<S> ConfigFetcherState<S> {
impl<S> ConfigFetcherState<S, NativeHttpClient> {
pub fn new(invariants: ConfigInvariants) -> Self {
Self::with_client(invariants, NativeHttpClient::new_client())

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Avoid pooling the default remote-config client

With the default constructor, every SingleFetcher/SharedFetcher now stores one NativeHttpClient for the whole polling loop. NativeHttpClient caches a new_default_client() in a OnceLock, and new_default_client() keeps idle connections, while http_common::new_client_periodic() explicitly disables pooling because the agent's low keep-alive can close the pipe on the next periodic request. For default RC polling, this changes the previous per-request client behavior into pooled reuse and can make subsequent polls fail intermittently; please use a periodic/no-idle native client for the default.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread libdd-remote-config/src/fetch/single.rs Outdated
Comment on lines 130 to 133
impl<S: FileStorage> SingleChangesFetcher<S, NativeHttpClient>
where
S::StoredFile: FilePath,
{

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Add a custom-client constructor for SingleChangesFetcher

Although the struct is now generic over C, this only public constructor remains on SingleChangesFetcher<S, NativeHttpClient>, and the private changes field prevents downstream code from constructing SingleChangesFetcher<S, C> around SingleFetcher::with_client. Callers that use the change-tracking API rather than raw fetch_once still cannot inject a custom HttpClientCapability; add a with_client constructor mirroring SingleFetcher::with_client.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread libdd-remote-config/Cargo.toml Outdated
client = [
"libdd-trace-protobuf",
"libdd-capabilities",
"libdd-capabilities-impl",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Do not force native HTTP for custom clients

Enabling the client feature now always enables libdd-capabilities-impl, even when a downstream only wants to instantiate ConfigFetcherState::with_client with its own HttpClientCapability. I checked libdd-capabilities-impl/src/http.rs, and that implementation imports native-only pieces such as libdd_common::connector::Connector, so custom-client builds for non-native targets still have to compile the native backend and fail before they can supply their own client. Please keep the native implementation behind the default/native constructors or a target-specific dependency instead of making it mandatory for client.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

As a side-effect, this fixes the missing timeout on the remote config body awaiting.

Signed-off-by: Bob Weinand <bob.weinand@datadoghq.com>
@bwoebi
bwoebi force-pushed the bob/rc-native-client branch from 36072ea to 39d4b97 Compare July 17, 2026 17:59
@bwoebi
bwoebi requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2026 17:59
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 7.88 MB 7.95 MB +.79% (+64.00 KB) 🔍
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 86.33 MB 86.33 MB -0% (-216 B) 👌
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 97.55 MB 97.55 MB +0% (+1.64 KB) 👌
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.62 MB 10.62 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
libdatadog-x64-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 25.58 MB 25.58 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 89.18 KB 89.18 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 185.49 MB 185.49 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 958.38 MB 958.56 MB +.01% (+177.59 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 8.37 MB 8.37 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 89.18 KB 89.18 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 24.76 MB 24.76 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 49.28 MB 49.28 MB -0% (-290 B) 👌
libdatadog-x86-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 22.23 MB 22.23 MB +0% (+1.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 90.58 KB 90.58 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 189.97 MB 189.96 MB -0% (-8.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 946.27 MB 946.41 MB +.01% (+147.57 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 6.47 MB 6.47 MB +0% (+512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 90.58 KB 90.58 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 26.59 MB 26.59 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 46.90 MB 46.90 MB +0% (+436 B) 👌
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 77.08 MB 77.08 MB -0% (-424 B) 👌
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 8.83 MB 8.83 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 92.50 MB 92.50 MB -0% (-448 B) 👌
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.74 MB 10.74 MB 0% (0 B) 👌

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Comparison

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-17 18:31:57

Comparing candidate commit 39d4b97 in PR branch bob/rc-native-client with baseline commit d7980db in branch main.

Found 12 performance improvements and 7 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 123 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:otlp/e2e_json/1x1000

  • 🟩 execution_time [-373.040µs; -370.033µs] or [-8.380%; -8.312%]

scenario:otlp/encode_json/1x1000

  • 🟩 execution_time [-368.238µs; -367.772µs] or [-17.261%; -17.239%]

scenario:otlp/encode_protobuf/1x1000

  • 🟥 execution_time [+54.744µs; +55.079µs] or [+5.171%; +5.203%]

scenario:profiles_dictionary/profile_string_inserts/threads/1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+14.104µs; +17.482µs] or [+4.639%; +5.751%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-184280.592op/s; -148488.551op/s] or [-5.471%; -4.408%]

scenario:vec_map/get_hit/128

  • 🟩 execution_time [-942.132ns; -936.041ns] or [-6.982%; -6.937%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+707189.603op/s; +711750.808op/s] or [+7.456%; +7.504%]

scenario:vec_map/get_hit/16

  • 🟥 execution_time [+13.163ns; +13.337ns] or [+6.583%; +6.669%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5003656.496op/s; -4939943.811op/s] or [-6.254%; -6.174%]

scenario:vec_map/get_hit/64

  • 🟩 execution_time [-289.755ns; -287.147ns] or [-7.887%; -7.816%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1477532.784op/s; +1490725.712op/s] or [+8.482%; +8.558%]

scenario:vec_map/get_hit/8

  • 🟥 execution_time [+7.781ns; +7.925ns] or [+14.419%; +14.685%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-18976575.783op/s; -18672051.134op/s] or [-12.801%; -12.596%]

scenario:vec_map/get_mut/128

  • 🟩 execution_time [-2.300µs; -2.193µs] or [-14.384%; -13.715%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1275595.554op/s; +1339808.164op/s] or [+15.928%; +16.730%]

scenario:vec_map/get_mut/16

  • 🟩 execution_time [-33.113ns; -21.706ns] or [-11.076%; -7.261%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+4489392.590op/s; +6743629.762op/s] or [+8.316%; +12.492%]

scenario:vec_map/get_mut/64

  • 🟩 execution_time [-604.353ns; -562.172ns] or [-13.676%; -12.722%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2125301.275op/s; +2288856.088op/s] or [+14.666%; +15.795%]

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-17 18:47:32

Comparing candidate commit 39d4b97 in PR branch bob/rc-native-client with baseline commit d7980db in branch main.

Found 23 performance improvements and 4 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 150 metrics, 10 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:alloc_free/sampled_system_fast_path/4096

  • 🟥 execution_time [+5.704ns; +5.864ns] or [+5.908%; +6.074%]

scenario:alloc_free/sampled_system_slow_path/4096

  • 🟥 execution_time [+9.046ns; +9.146ns] or [+6.079%; +6.147%]

scenario:alloc_free/system/4096

  • 🟥 execution_time [+16.668ns; +16.758ns] or [+21.377%; +21.493%]

scenario:credit_card/is_card_number/ 3782-8224-6310-005

  • 🟩 execution_time [-5.881µs; -5.714µs] or [-7.284%; -7.077%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+944345.945op/s; +973417.445op/s] or [+7.624%; +7.859%]

scenario:credit_card/is_card_number/ 378282246310005

  • 🟩 execution_time [-5.941µs; -5.861µs] or [-8.062%; -7.955%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1173897.713op/s; +1188741.999op/s] or [+8.650%; +8.759%]

scenario:credit_card/is_card_number/378282246310005

  • 🟩 execution_time [-6.173µs; -6.092µs] or [-8.732%; -8.617%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1335194.132op/s; +1351576.640op/s] or [+9.439%; +9.555%]

scenario:credit_card/is_card_number/37828224631000521389798

  • 🟩 execution_time [-7.910µs; -7.855µs] or [-14.876%; -14.773%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+3261288.024op/s; +3286024.158op/s] or [+17.340%; +17.472%]

scenario:credit_card/is_card_number/x371413321323331

  • 🟩 execution_time [-409.118ns; -406.132ns] or [-6.342%; -6.295%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+10416672.736op/s; +10492406.236op/s] or [+6.720%; +6.769%]

scenario:credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/ 378282246310005

  • 🟩 execution_time [-5.399µs; -5.359µs] or [-9.236%; -9.167%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1727418.614op/s; +1739452.134op/s] or [+10.098%; +10.169%]

scenario:credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/378282246310005

  • 🟩 execution_time [-5.748µs; -5.696µs] or [-10.341%; -10.247%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2055962.500op/s; +2073035.944op/s] or [+11.427%; +11.522%]

scenario:credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/37828224631000521389798

  • 🟩 execution_time [-7.855µs; -7.798µs] or [-14.791%; -14.684%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+3242380.142op/s; +3267139.408op/s] or [+17.220%; +17.351%]

scenario:credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/x371413321323331

  • 🟩 execution_time [-409.552ns; -407.007ns] or [-6.349%; -6.310%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+10443270.633op/s; +10507532.996op/s] or [+6.736%; +6.778%]

scenario:datadog_sample_span/name_pattern_rule_not_matching/wall_time

  • 🟥 execution_time [+22.771ns; +22.955ns] or [+14.209%; +14.324%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_case_insensitive_match/wall_time

  • 🟩 execution_time [-2.082ns; -2.062ns] or [-7.103%; -7.033%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_exact_match/wall_time

  • 🟩 execution_time [-2.086ns; -2.057ns] or [-7.115%; -7.016%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_exact_miss/wall_time

  • 🟩 execution_time [-1.203ns; -1.172ns] or [-8.820%; -8.592%]

scenario:trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay

  • 🟩 execution_time [-285.791µs; -254.144µs] or [-11.481%; -10.210%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+167184.980op/s; +189149.710op/s] or [+11.553%; +13.071%]

Candidate

Omitted due to size.

Baseline

Omitted due to size.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant