Add Silent Payments for the Liquid Network

elip-silent-payments-liquid.mediawiki

@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+<pre>
+ELIP: ?
+Layer: Applications
+Title: Silent Payments for the Liquid Network
+Author: 42pupusas <technology@illuminodes.com>
+Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
+Comments-URI: https://github.com/ElementsProject/elips/wiki/Comments:ELIP-????
+Status: Draft
+Type: Standards Track
+Created: 2026-06-01
+License: BSD-3-Clause
+</pre>
+
+==Abstract==
+
+This document specifies Silent Payments for the Liquid Network. The key derivation,
+address format, scanning, and spending follow BIP-352<ref name="bip352">BIP-352: Silent Payments. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0352.mediawiki</ref>
+exactly. This specification only adds Liquid-specific differences.
+
+==Motivation==
+
+Confidential Transactions (CT)<ref name="ct">Confidential Transactions. https://elementsproject.org/features/confidential-transactions</ref>
+hide a Liquid output's asset and amount but not its
+script. A receiver with one published address has to either reuse it, (linking
+all their payments) or run an interactive protocol to hand out fresh ones. Silent
+Payments remove that trade-off: one static address, a distinct unlinkable output per payment.
+
+==Specification==
+
+We reuse the notation, functions, and conventions of BIP-352. In particular,
+<code>serP(P)</code> is the SEC1 compressed encoding of a point, <code>ser32(i)</code>
+serializes a 32-bit unsigned integer most-significant-byte first, <code>n</code> is the
+secp256k1 curve order, and <code>hash<sub>tag</sub>(x)</code> denotes
+<code>SHA256(SHA256(tag) || SHA256(tag) || x)</code> as defined in
+BIP-340<ref name="bip340">BIP-340: Schnorr Signatures for secp256k1. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki</ref>.
+
+We additionally define:
+
+* Let <code>blind_tag</code> be the exact 26-byte ASCII string <code>LiquidSilentPayments/Blind</code>.
+
+A mismatch in these bytes breaks unblinding across implementations. The tag is disjoint
+from BIP-352's <code>BIP0352/SharedSecret</code>, so the blinding key and the BIP-352
+output tweak, though both derived from <code>S</code>, do not reveal each other.
+
+A silent payment on Liquid is a BIP-352 output that is additionally made a confidential
+Liquid output, blinded to a per-output blinding key derived from the same shared secret.
+The sender, for each output index <code>k</code>:
+
+* Let <code>S</code> be the shared secret and <code>P_k</code> the output public key, derived as in BIP-352
+* Let <code>scriptPubKey = OP_1 <x_only(P_k)></code>, a BIP-341<ref name="bip341">BIP-341: Taproot: SegWit version 1 spending rules. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki</ref> Taproot output
+* Let <code>bk_k = int(hash<sub>blind_tag</sub>(serP(S) || ser32(k))) mod n</code>
+** If <code>bk_k = 0</code>, increment <code>k</code> and continue
+* Let <code>BK_k = bk_k·G</code>
+* Blind the output's asset and amount to <code>BK_k</code>, as for any confidential Liquid output
+
+The receiver, having recomputed <code>S</code> as in BIP-352, recomputes
+<code>bk_k</code> and unblinds the output with no out-of-band exchange. Deriving the
+blinding key from <code>S</code> avoids both a fixed address-level blinding key (which
+would link a receiver's outputs) and an interactive per-output exchange.
+
+===Differences from BIP-352===
+
+* '''Output format.''' The output is a ''confidential'' Liquid Taproot<ref name="bip341" /> output, with its asset and amount blinded to <code>BK_k</code>, rather than a bare Taproot output.
+* '''<code>outpoint_L</code> encoding.''' Outpoints use the Elements consensus encoding (32-byte txid in internal byte order followed by 4-byte little-endian <code>vout</code>) in place of BIP-352's Bitcoin encoding.
+* '''Address HRP.''' The human-readable part is <code>lqsp</code> (mainnet) or <code>tlqsp</code> (testnet and regtest) — distinct from <code>ex</code>/<code>tex</code>, <code>lq</code>/<code>tlq</code>, and Bitcoin's <code>sp</code>/<code>tsp</code>. The address payload, version symbol (<code>q</code>), and relaxed Bech32 length limit are unchanged from BIP-352.
+* '''Light-client scanning.''' The BIP-158<ref name="bip158">BIP-158: Compact Block Filters for Light Clients. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0158.mediawiki</ref> compact-filter step is unnecessary: CT does not blind the <code>scriptPubKey</code>, so a client matches its derived candidate scripts directly against the public output scripts. The BIP-352 tweak server<ref name="indexserver">BIP-352 Silent Payments index server. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0352/index-server.mediawiki</ref> (publishing <code>T = input_hash·A</code> per transaction) is used unchanged.
+
+Everything else follows BIP-352 exactly: input eligibility, the even-Y rule,
+<code>input_hash</code>, <code>S = input_hash·a·B_scan</code>, the output tweak
+<code>t_k</code>, labels, gap-limit scanning, and the Taproot key-path spend with
+<code>d = b_spend + t_k</code>.
+
+===Privacy===
+
+Detecting or unblinding a silent payment requires the Diffie-Hellman shared secret
+<code>S = input_hash·a·B_scan = b_scan·(input_hash·A)</code>. Computing it needs either the
+sender's input secret <code>a</code> or the receiver's secret scan key <code>b_scan</code>,
+so this inherits the BIP-352 privacy model. CT adds one thing on top: even someone who
+holds <code>b_scan</code> learns only that an output is a silent payment, not its amount or asset.
+
+==Test Vectors==
+
+All byte strings are hex. Receiver keys:
+
+<pre>
+b_scan  = 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
+b_spend = 2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
+</pre>
+
+Two eligible inputs:
+
+<pre>
+input 0: priv = 3131...31 (0x31 x32), outpoint txid = 1010...10 (0x10 x32), vout = 0
+input 1: priv = 3232...32 (0x32 x32), outpoint txid = 2020...20 (0x20 x32), vout = 1
+</pre>
+
+Aggregated values (<code>outpoint_L</code> = input 0, the lexicographically smaller):
+
+<pre>
+A          = 031195a8046dcbb8e17034bca630065e7a0982e4e36f6f7e5a8d4554e4846fcd99
+input_hash = d392922c00280a7e8d282182f5026f2fddbc74c1e1de18b4822128b2b77ec641
+</pre>
+
+Per-output values:
+
+<pre>
+k = 0:
+  P_k = 02a29d9716417c964ca9e477343e71ffe730a4991a3eaad668eabec84e9feb7931
+  BK_k = 0344e1289497e6da66fde710d2f38de053fc07355e405524401d7d609df5a1a8cc
+  bk_k = 70ab8897b64bd21b427339ff4d014b883191ef6425862246c53bfc27a59aa3f0
+  spend priv = f03c436d2cd67ae1fecf7d88a38aa3a03c0abea43feaf6da8eb71e2e3a866bda
+  scriptPubKey = 5120a29d9716417c964ca9e477343e71ffe730a4991a3eaad668eabec84e9feb7931
+
+k = 1:
+  P_k = 0229d77654023af267dbe9cb7ff1956f947c816f203494381308387168fb010c92
+  BK_k = 03efdeda770ccdbe8bf466fba48bfd2b2c436ab0c04658fc6d6c277de5078129fa
+  bk_k = 945ba73a9804f62089c7d2ffdc079031031f0aebab372cec17ef9c110ebceb10
+  spend priv = 9eff3472230fc83ef5ea8f8c80401c4eecd595a048bd2482a107d3a49baa5a58
+  scriptPubKey = 512029d77654023af267dbe9cb7ff1956f947c816f203494381308387168fb010c92
+</pre>
+
+Mainnet address (HRP <code>lqsp</code>):
+
+<pre>
+lqsp1qqd8n2k7uklxq4aegau7vawtptkgxsja4kt99lpv6krctwpq8tpc65qjxd4lu4etruh9sngx3su9mtqp5fqzxz7re59y5nnez9p03ht3lyudcfhfe
+</pre>
+
+Because blinding factors are randomized per output, the blinded output is not
+byte-reproducible. What matters is that an output blinded to <code>BK_k</code>
+unblinds under <code>bk_k</code> and under no other key.
+
+==Backwards Compatibility==
+
+No consensus change. A silent-payment output is an ordinary confidential Taproot output,
+spent by an ordinary key-path signature, so existing relay and validation rules apply.
+Wallets that don't implement this are unaffected.
+
+==Reference Implementations==
+
+* Rust: [[elip-silent-payments-liquid/rust/src/lib.rs|elip-silent-payments-liquid/rust/src/lib.rs]]
+* Python: [[elip-silent-payments-liquid/python/elip_sp_reference/core.py|elip-silent-payments-liquid/python/elip_sp_reference/core.py]]
+
+==Acknowledgements==
+
+This specification builds on BIP-352, the BIP-352 index server specification<ref name="indexserver" />,
+and the Confidential Transactions work of the Elements Project<ref name="ct" />.
+
+The authors thank JAN3 for sponsoring and supporting this work.
+
+==References==
+
+<references />

elip-silent-payments-liquid/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# elip-silent-payments-liquid — reference implementations
+
+Reference implementations for [`elip-silent-payments-liquid.mediawiki`](../elip-silent-payments-liquid.mediawiki),
+following the layout convention of [bitcoin/bips](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips)
+(e.g. `bip-0352/`): supporting code lives in a folder named after the ELIP.
+
+Two independent implementations derive the same test vectors byte-for-byte:
+
+- [`rust/`](rust) — built on `lwk_wollet`. `cargo test` to run.
+- [`python/`](python) — in the canonical BIP-352 `reference.py` style, using the
+  pure-Python `secp256k1lab` for the curve algebra and `wallycore` only for the
+  Liquid Confidential Transactions plumbing. See [`python/README.md`](python/README.md).
+
+Both cover:
+
+- **Address encoding** — Bech32m, HRP `lqsp`/`tlqsp`, version `q`
+- **Sender derivation** — input aggregation, ECDH shared secret, `P_k`, `BK_k`, `bk_k`
+- **Tweak server** — `T = input_hash · A`, publish, and client-side `S = b_scan · T`
+- **Receiver scanning** — recompute `P_k`, match against outputs, derive spend secret
+- **Confidential output blinding and unblinding** — the ELIP's novel claim: `bk_k`
+  derived from the shared secret unblinds the output non-interactively
+- **Test vectors** — deterministic known-answer values matching the ELIP specification
+
+## License
+
+BSD-3-Clause.

elip-silent-payments-liquid/python/.gitignore

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+# Virtual environments
+.venv/
+venv/
+
+# Build / packaging artifacts
+*.egg-info/
+build/
+dist/
+
+# Caches
+__pycache__/
+*.py[cod]
+.pytest_cache/

elip-silent-payments-liquid/python/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Python reference implementation
+
+Written in the style of the canonical
+[BIP-352 reference](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0352/reference.py):
+the elliptic-curve algebra is done with the pure-Python
+[`secp256k1lab`](https://github.com/secp256k1lab/secp256k1lab), so the spec math
+reads literally —
+
+```python
+P_k = B_spend + t_k * G                      # output public key
+S   = input_hash * a * B_scan                # sender's shared secret
+a   = -a   if is_taproot and odd_y else a    # BIP-341 even-Y normalization
+```
+
+It re-derives the ELIP's test vectors byte-for-byte (the same constants as the
+sibling Rust [`reference`](../rust) implementation).
+
+> **INSECURE.** `secp256k1lab` is slow and not constant-time, intended for
+> prototyping, test vectors, and education only. Do not use in production.
+
+## What's BIP-352 and what's new
+
+Everything up to the output public key `P_k` is plain BIP-352. The two
+Liquid-specific additions are:
+
+1. **The output blinding key** `bk_k = tagged_hash("LiquidSilentPayments/Blind",
+   serP(S) || ser32(k))`. Both parties derive it from the shared secret `S`, so
+   the receiver can unblind the Confidential Transactions output with no
+   out-of-band data.
+2. **The CT plumbing** (`build_confidential_sp_txout` / `unblind_output`) — the
+   one place needing Liquid primitives, so it (and only it) uses `wallycore`.
+   Everything else is pure `secp256k1lab`.
+
+## Layout
+
+```
+elip_sp_reference/
+  __init__.py     public API re-exports
+  core.py         the protocol — addresses, inputs, shared secret, derivation,
+                  tweak server, and CT blinding/unblinding
+  bech32m.py      Bech32m, verbatim from BIP-350 / the BIP-352 reference
+tests/
+  test_vectors.py byte-pinned vectors + taproot/tweak-server/address/CT round-trips
+```
+
+## Running
+
+```sh
+python3 -m venv .venv
+source .venv/bin/activate          # fish: source .venv/bin/activate.fish
+pip install -e '.[test]'
+pytest -v
+```
+
+`secp256k1lab` is fetched from git (it is not published on PyPI). `wallycore`'s
+PyPI wheels are built with Elements support, which the CT test needs; if it is
+not installed, that one test is skipped automatically.

elip-silent-payments-liquid/python/elip_sp_reference/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+"""Silent Payments for the Liquid Network — Python reference implementation.
+
+Written in the style of the canonical BIP-352 reference, using the pure-Python
+``secp256k1lab`` for the curve algebra (so the spec math reads literally) and
+``wallycore`` only for the Liquid-specific Confidential Transactions plumbing.
+
+INSECURE — prototyping and test vectors only. See :mod:`elip_sp_reference.core`.
+"""
+
+from .core import (
+    TAG_INPUTS,
+    TAG_SHARED_SECRET,
+    TAG_BLIND,
+    SP_ADDRESS_VERSION,
+    ser_uint32,
+    hrp_for,
+    encode_silent_payment_address,
+    decode_silent_payment_address,
+    sum_input_privkeys,
+    get_input_hash,
+    sender_shared_secret,
+    receiver_shared_secret,
+    output_tweak,
+    output_pubkey,
+    output_spend_privkey,
+    blinding_privkey,
+    script_pubkey,
+    compute_tweak,
+    shared_secret_from_tweak,
+    build_confidential_sp_txout,
+    unblind_output,
+)
+
+__all__ = [
+    "TAG_INPUTS",
+    "TAG_SHARED_SECRET",
+    "TAG_BLIND",
+    "SP_ADDRESS_VERSION",
+    "ser_uint32",
+    "hrp_for",
+    "encode_silent_payment_address",
+    "decode_silent_payment_address",
+    "sum_input_privkeys",
+    "get_input_hash",
+    "sender_shared_secret",
+    "receiver_shared_secret",
+    "output_tweak",
+    "output_pubkey",
+    "output_spend_privkey",
+    "blinding_privkey",
+    "script_pubkey",
+    "compute_tweak",
+    "shared_secret_from_tweak",
+    "build_confidential_sp_txout",
+    "unblind_output",
+]