Implementing Shared Library loading on Windows

.github/adr_template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+---
+id: ADR-XXXX
+title: Short, descriptive title of the decision
+date: YYYY-MM-DD
+status: proposed # proposed | accepted | rejected | deprecated | superseded
+authors:
+  - Author Name
+deciders:
+  - Decider Name
+---
+
+<!-- markdownlint-disable MD025 -->
+# ADR-XXXX: [Short, descriptive title of the decision]
+
+![Proposed][badge-proposed]
+<!-- proposed | accepted | rejected | deprecated | superseded -->
+
+*(If superseded, link to the new ADR: "Superseded by [ADR-YYYY](path/to/adr-yyyy.md)")*
+
+## Context
+
+Describe the problem space, the current technical constraints, and the forces at play.
+
+- What is the issue we are trying to solve?
+- Why does it need to be solved now?
+- Are there performance, architectural, or organizational constraints?
+
+## Decision
+
+State the clear, actionable architectural decision.
+
+- What are we choosing to do?
+- Be precise and concrete. If this introduces a new pattern, tool, or folder structure, describe it
+  exactly.
+
+## Alternatives Considered
+
+Briefly document other approaches that were evaluated and why they were ultimately rejected.
+
+### Option A: [Short description of the alternative]
+
+Explain the alternative.
+
+**Why rejected:** Describe the reasons this option was not chosen. Focus on trade-offs, not just
+personal preference.
+
+### Option B: [Short description of the alternative]
+
+Explain the alternative.
+
+**Why rejected:** Describe the reasons this option was not chosen. Focus on trade-offs, not just
+personal preference.
+
+## Consequences
+
+List the direct outcomes of applying this decision. Focus on trade-offs.
+
+### Positive
+
+- (e.g., Reduces cross-module coupling)
+- (e.g., Improves rendering thread performance by 15%)
+
+### Negative
+
+- (e.g., Increases initial boilerplate for creating new modules)
+- (e.g., Requires migrating X legacy systems to the new API)
+
+## Rationale and Cross-References
+
+- [ADR-YYYY](./ADR-YYYY.md): Link to related ADRs that influenced this decision.
+
+**Canonical references:**
+
+- Other projects, patterns, or literature that influenced this decision.
+
+<!-- markdownlint-disable MD053 -->
+[badge-proposed]: https://img.shields.io/badge/Status-Proposed-yellow.svg
+[badge-accepted]: https://img.shields.io/badge/Status-Accepted-brightgreen.svg
+[badge-rejected]: https://img.shields.io/badge/Status-Rejected-red.svg
+[badge-deprecated]: https://img.shields.io/badge/Status-Deprecated-lightgrey.svg
+[badge-superseded]: https://img.shields.io/badge/Status-Superseded-lightgrey.svg