Otto-Support Supply Chain Risks in MCP Servers#2232
Open
carlospolop wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
🔗 Additional ContextOriginal Blog Post: https://bishopfox.com/blog/otto-support-supply-chain-risks-mcp-servers Content Categories: Based on the analysis, this content was categorized under "AI Security > AI MCP Security, with possible cross-reference from Phishing Methodology > AI Agent Abuse Local AI CLI Tools And MCP". Repository Maintenance:
Review Notes:
Bot Version: HackTricks News Bot v1.0 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤖 Automated Content Update
This PR was automatically generated by the HackTricks News Bot based on a technical blog post.
📝 Source Information
🎯 Content Summary
Post: Bishop Fox's Otto-Support: Supply Chain Risks in MCP Servers explains how Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers create a supply-chain attack surface when locally installed tooling is treated as trusted infrastructure. The post does not describe a CVE; it describes a structural trust weakness in MCP deployments: the protocol defines how tools are discovered and invoked, but it does not verify that the installed implementation is still the same code that was reviewed earlier....
🔧 Technical Details
Malicious MCP update with unchanged interface: A malicious maintainer or attacker who compromises an MCP package can keep the same tool name, schema, arguments, and expected output while adding hidden exfiltration logic. This bypasses basic functional tests because the visible tool still works. The
postmark-mcpexample demonstrates the pattern: after 15 benign versions, version1.0.16added a hidden BCC to attacker-controlled email for every outgoing message while still sending the requested email normally.Abusing local
stdioexecution context: MCP servers launched locally overstdioinherit the same user permissions as the shell or AI assistant process. Any readable local secret becomes available to the server without additional exploitation. A hostile server can enumerate and read files such as~/.ssh/id_ed25519,~/.aws/credentials,~/.kube/config,~/.docker/c...🤖 Agent ActionsDone.
Updated
src/AI/AI-MCP-Servers.mdwith a new section on:stdioMCP servers inheriting full user contextotto-support selfpwnas a defensive exposure modelselfpwn.goValidation:
git diff --checkpassedmdbook buildcould not run becausemdbookis not installed in this environmentThis PR was automatically created by the HackTricks Feed Bot. Please review the changes carefully before merging.