Skip to content

Correct 'demons' to 'daemons' in LSP documentation#11387

Open
LLLichlet wants to merge 1 commit into
MicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
LLLichlet:patch-1
Open

Correct 'demons' to 'daemons' in LSP documentation#11387
LLLichlet wants to merge 1 commit into
MicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
LLLichlet:patch-1

Conversation

@LLLichlet

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The demon is a typo. Maybe 'daemon'?

@prmerger-automator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@LLLichlet : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@prmerger-automator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@LLLichlet : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 28a2e6d:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/extensibility/language-server-protocol.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Fixes a typo in the Language Server Protocol (LSP) documentation by correcting the term “demons” to the intended computing term “daemons”, improving technical accuracy in the extensibility docs.

Changes:

  • Replaces “demons” with “daemons” in the description of language server processes.

@Court72

Court72 commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tinaschrepfer

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator Bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Jul 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants