Repository navigation
Adding Merge Queue Support #8991
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ericspod
wants to merge
10
commits into
Project-MONAI:dev
Choose a base branch
from
ericspod:enable_merge_queue_actions
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
93f0330
Adding Merge Queue Support
ericspod a84b424
Merge branch 'dev' into enable_merge_queue_actions
ericspod 1448a43
Merge branch 'dev' into enable_merge_queue_actions
ericspod 8f8fa8f
Remove paths-ignore
ericspod de36fee
Merge branch 'dev' into enable_merge_queue_actions
ericspod c5b6c49
Merge branch 'dev' into enable_merge_queue_actions
ericspod 20e76cb
Merge branch 'dev' into enable_merge_queue_actions
ericspod 6581f8b
Merge branch 'dev' into enable_merge_queue_actions
ericspod d284dd1
Merge branch 'dev' into enable_merge_queue_actions
ericspod b2e84b0
Adding branch push triggers
ericspod File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This adds the
merge_grouptrigger for the GitHub-Actions-hosted checks, but the branch protection ruleset (ID 16034365) also requires third-party checks: DCO, DeepSource (Docker/Python/Shell), and pre-commit.ci. A merge queue entry only completes when every required check reports on thegh-readonly-queue/...branch. Have these external apps been verified to supportmerge_groupevents, or will they be excluded from the merge queue's required checks? If not, enqueued PRs will wait until the queue times out.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't honestly know, we might have to see if it goes through or adjust our branch rules. The DCO, pre-commit, and other checks don't need to be run again in the queue, only code that's gotten through a PR is in the queue, so it would be good to exclude them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added the triggers for pushes on branches matching
gh-readonly-queue/*so that should cause these to work, the outstanding concerns are if pre-commit, DeepSource, and DCO will get through in the merge queue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we relaxed the rules on those other tests being necessary I don't think much would be lost since a review from an owner is still require, all of which know better than to merge something failing tests.