x86: Fix various duplicate-word comment typos

  [ mingo: Consolidated 4 very similar patches into one, it's silly to spread this out. ]

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220715044809.20572-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com

Author: Jason Wang

arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static u32 *iommu_gatt_base;		/* Remapping table */
  * of only flushing when an mapping is reused. With it true the GART is
  * flushed for every mapping. Problem is that doing the lazy flush seems
  * to trigger bugs with some popular PCI cards, in particular 3ware (but
- * has been also also seen with Qlogic at least).
+ * has been also seen with Qlogic at least).
  */
 static int iommu_fullflush = 1;
 

arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 /*
  * Using 512M as goal, in case kexec will load kernel_big
  * that will do the on-position decompress, and could overlap with
- * with the gart aperture that is used.
+ * the gart aperture that is used.
  * Sequence:
  * kernel_small
  * ==> kexec (with kdump trigger path or gart still enabled)

arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c

@@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
 	 * bits which we consider mandatory enabled.
 	 * The CR0_READ_SHADOW is what L2 should have expected to read given
 	 * the specifications by L1; It's not enough to take
-	 * vmcs12->cr0_read_shadow because on our cr0_guest_host_mask we we
+	 * vmcs12->cr0_read_shadow because on our cr0_guest_host_mask we
 	 * have more bits than L1 expected.
 	 */
 	vmx_set_cr0(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_cr0);

arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c

@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void __init do_add_efi_memmap(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * Given add_efi_memmap defaults to 0 and there there is no alternative
+ * Given add_efi_memmap defaults to 0 and there is no alternative
  * e820 mechanism for soft-reserved memory, import the full EFI memory
  * map if soft reservations are present and enabled. Otherwise, the
  * mechanism to disable the kernel's consideration of EFI_MEMORY_SP is