mm: memcg: add cacheline padding after lruvec in mem_cgroup_per_node

Oliver Sand reported a performance regression caused by commit
98c9daf ("mm: memcg: guard memcg1-specific members of struct
mem_cgroup_per_node"), which puts some fields of the mem_cgroup_per_node
structure under the CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 config option.  Apparently it causes a
false cache sharing between lruvec and lru_zone_size members of the
structure.  Fix it by adding an explicit padding after the lruvec member.

Even though the padding is not required with CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 set, it seems
like the introduced memory overhead is not significant enough to warrant
another divergence in the mem_cgroup_per_node layout, so the padding is
added unconditionally.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240723171244.747521-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev
Fixes: 98c9daf ("mm: memcg: guard memcg1-specific members of struct mem_cgroup_per_node")
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202407121335.31a10cb6-oliver.sang@intel.com
Tested-by: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Author: rgushchin

include/linux/memcontrol.h

@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
 
 	/* Fields which get updated often at the end. */
 	struct lruvec		lruvec;
+	CACHELINE_PADDING(_pad2_);
 	unsigned long		lru_zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES][NR_LRU_LISTS];
 	struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter	iter;
 };