Skip to content

Regenerate graphql-codegen output to match upstream schemas#7261

Closed
RyanDJLee wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
04-13-regenerate_graphql_codegen
Closed

Regenerate graphql-codegen output to match upstream schemas#7261
RyanDJLee wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
04-13-regenerate_graphql_codegen

Conversation

@RyanDJLee
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Upstream GraphQL APIs updated their schemas, causing the "Check graphql-codegen has been run" CI check to fail for all PRs targeting main.

Running pnpm graphql-codegen on main HEAD produces 55 changed files — this is a repo-wide blocker, not specific to any PR.

Changes

  • 55 generated files regenerated across admin, app-management, business-platform-*, bulk-operations, functions, partners, and webhooks
  • Two mechanical changes per file: import extension .js → extensionless, export name suffix Document added
  • No query or config changes

Upstream GraphQL APIs (admin, app-management, business-platform-*,
bulk-operations, functions, partners, webhooks) updated their schemas.
The committed generated types drifted, causing the "Check graphql-codegen
has been run" CI check to fail for all PRs.

55 files, mechanical regeneration only — no query or config changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@RyanDJLee RyanDJLee requested a review from a team as a code owner April 13, 2026 15:41
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 13, 2026 15:41
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

RyanDJLee commented Apr 13, 2026

@RyanDJLee
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing — the raw codegen output breaks type checking and consumers because the sed postprocess step didn't run. The codegen pipeline needs investigation before this can land.

@RyanDJLee RyanDJLee closed this Apr 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants