Skip to content

GROOVY-12425: Refine error message for unclosed type argument - #2944

Open
daniellansun wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
GROOVY-12425
Open

daniellansun wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
GROOVY-12425

Conversation

@daniellansun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 71.6045%. Comparing base (40e59c5) to head (ecdc749).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##               master      #2944        +/-   ##
==================================================
- Coverage     71.6067%   71.6045%   -0.0022%     
+ Complexity      38062      38058         -4     
==================================================
  Files            1588       1588                
  Lines          137078     137078                
  Branches        25507      25507                
==================================================
- Hits            98157      98154         -3     
  Misses          30014      30014                
- Partials         8907       8910         +3     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...va/org/apache/groovy/parser/antlr4/AstBuilder.java 87.1124% <100.0000%> (ø)

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JMH summary — classic (commit 41302f7)

Speedup vs trailing 90-day baseline on gh-pages. Higher = faster.
1.00 = in line with history. Per-benchmark ratio, geomean within group.
Time-per-op units inverted so direction is consistent. The calibrated
column divides out this runner's speed vs the baseline hardware, as
measured by Groovy-independent pure-Java ruler benchmarks.

Group Speedup Calibrated n
bench 0.959 × 1.041 × 124
core 1.331 × 1.154 × 108
grails 1.017 × 1.053 × 80

No benchmark is ≥1.5× slower than its 90-day baseline.

⚠️ Runner speed differs ≥15% from the historical baseline hardware for: core-ag. Raw speedups are not meaningful for those parts — use the calibrated column.

Runner calibration (this run vs baseline hardware): bench 0.93× (27 rulers) · core-ag 1.26× (3 rulers) · core-hz 0.98× (3 rulers) · grails-ad 0.96× (3 rulers) · grails-ez 0.97× (3 rulers)

Baseline: dev/bench/jmh/<part>/classic/data.js on gh-pages, trailing 90 days. Daily dashboard · Per-suite raw data

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JMH summary — indy (commit 41302f7)

Speedup vs trailing 90-day baseline on gh-pages. Higher = faster.
1.00 = in line with history. Per-benchmark ratio, geomean within group.
Time-per-op units inverted so direction is consistent. The calibrated
column divides out this runner's speed vs the baseline hardware, as
measured by Groovy-independent pure-Java ruler benchmarks.

Group Speedup Calibrated n
bench 1.038 × 1.108 × 124
core 3.384 × 3.556 × 108
grails 2.527 × 2.694 × 80

No benchmark is ≥1.5× slower than its 90-day baseline.

Runner calibration (this run vs baseline hardware): bench 0.96× (27 rulers) · core-ag 0.96× (3 rulers) · core-hz 0.94× (3 rulers) · grails-ad 0.97× (3 rulers) · grails-ez 0.91× (3 rulers)

Baseline: dev/bench/jmh/<part>/indy/data.js on gh-pages, trailing 90 days. Daily dashboard · Per-suite raw data

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@testlens-app

testlens-app Bot commented Sep 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ All tests passed ✅

🏷️ Commit: ecdc749
▶️ Tests: 120276 executed
⚪️ Checks: 32/32 completed


Learn more about TestLens at testlens.app/docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants