-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
Fix inline shortcut registration failure when multiple EditorJS instances share a page #3003
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Copilot
wants to merge
8
commits into
next
Choose a base branch
from
copilot/fix-inline-shortcut-registration-issue
base: next
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
10b7045
Initial plan
Copilot bd5c631
fix: allow multiple editor instances to register inline shortcuts on …
Copilot 95e9659
test: add multi-instance inline shortcut test, bump version to 2.31.7…
Copilot dbef3a5
test: rename multi-instance shortcut test to describe exact behaviour
Copilot c5bff13
test: use cy.clock() to exercise shortcuts.ts duplicate-registration fix
Copilot 3abfa3c
test: simplify multi-instance shortcut test; remove cy.clock() (Firef…
Copilot 882fa3d
test: dispatch shortcut keydown on paragraph element, not document
Copilot be18268
test: dispatch keydown on paragraph element in read-only mode test too
Copilot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@copilot Look like if you will remove your changes from "src/components/utils/shortcuts.ts", this test will still be passed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed in
c5bff13. The test now usescy.clock()to freeze the selectionchange debounce after editor 1's shortcut is registered, then callseditor2.inlineToolbar.open()via the public API before that debounce fires. At that moment editor 1'sCMD+SHIFT+Mhandler is still live ondocument, soenableShortcuts()hits the duplicate-registration path. Without theshortcuts.tsfix (the removedthrow) it silently fails to register editor 2's shortcut →toolActivated2never fires → test fails. Ticking past the debounce afterwards also exercises theinline.tsfix, confirming editor 1's shortcut is removed correctly.