Skip to content

Implement auto-forget in Parquet converter lifecycle - #7752

Open
SungJin1212 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
Add-autoforgetdelay-parquet-converter
Open

Implement auto-forget in Parquet converter lifecycle#7752
SungJin1212 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
Add-autoforgetdelay-parquet-converter

Conversation

@SungJin1212

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this PR does:
Implement an auto-forget mechanism in the Parquet converter.
Note: This was already defined in the config, but it was a no-op.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]
  • docs/configuration/v1-guarantees.md updated if this PR introduces experimental flags

Signed-off-by: SungJin1212 <tjdwls1201@gmail.com>
@dosubot dosubot Bot added go Pull requests that update Go code type/feature labels Aug 6, 2026

@friedrichg friedrichg left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Comment thread pkg/parquetconverter/converter_test.go Outdated
Comment on lines +706 to +707
// UnregisterOnShutdown=false lets the instance stay in the ring
// after stopping, so we can verify auto-forget kicks it out.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// UnregisterOnShutdown=false lets the instance stay in the ring
// after stopping, so we can verify auto-forget kicks it out.

I think this can be removed.

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Aug 9, 2026
Signed-off-by: SungJin1212 <tjdwls1201@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

go Pull requests that update Go code lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size/M type/feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants