Skip to content

Stage Codex inspection before defect assessment - #5

Draft
dkropachev wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
experiment/codex-aspect-first
Draft

dkropachev wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
experiment/codex-aspect-first

Conversation

@dkropachev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue

Codex reviewers load defect-oriented briefs during initial source inspection. The workflow has no explicit boundary between recording source behavior and assessing it for candidate findings.

Fix

Run Toolkit, Standards, Spec, and conditional Performance passes through a read-only driver. Each reviewer first records observations against frozen Git pins, then the driver asks whether those observations reveal problems and collects cited findings for the existing parent verification.

Load assessment briefs after the factual pass, preserve the current permissions and host-controlled model settings, and mark the Codex path experimental. Synchronize the plugin version to 1.0.5.

Ask native reviewers to describe source behavior before the driver asks
about problems. Keep observations tied to frozen Git pins and collect
cited findings for the existing parent verification.

Delay assessment briefs until after the factual pass. Preserve read-only
permissions, native reviewer roles, and host-controlled model settings.

Mark the Codex path experimental and synchronize version 1.0.5.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant