Document the bugs-2026-09-02 parallel execution plan and terminal status - #786
Merged
Conversation
…st radii and 5 seeded cohorts
Generated from the parallel-orchestrator checkpoint at generation 0. Cohort 0 launched with items 564, 729 and 733. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013hACTdEjvRjdP48xdJ2B5V
Operator instruction: the run cap is 16 on every artifact that carries it. The manifest frontmatter, the manifest prose that explains the cap, and the generated status projection are updated together so the plan-home branch, the planner checkpoint, and the orchestrator checkpoint agree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013hACTdEjvRjdP48xdJ2B5V
Item 564 merged into main as 8be5a6a. Items 729, 733 and 730 are in flight. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0195CL93aqgKF19nj9h6trbt
Items 564 and 729 are merged. Item 730 is green awaiting merge, 733 has its pull request open, and 735 and 737 are in flight. Lifecycle timestamps are corrected onto a single local timescale after a UTC merge time tripped the retrospective cohort-barrier temporal check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three of thirteen items are merged: 564, 729 and 730. Item 733 has its pull request open and 735 and 737 are in flight. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four of thirteen items are merged: 564, 729, 730 and 733. Items 735 and 737 have pull requests open and 565 is in flight. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Five of thirteen items are merged: 564, 729, 730, 733 and 735. Item 737 has a pull request awaiting checks on its updated head and 565 is in flight. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Six of thirteen items are merged: 564, 729, 730, 733, 735 and 737. Merging 737 released 645 and 732, both now in flight alongside 565. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…request open Item 565 has pull request 753 open against main. Items 645 and 732 remain in flight. Six of thirteen items are merged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Seven of thirteen items are merged: 564, 565, 729, 730, 733, 735 and 737. Items 645 and 732 remain in flight; 584, 707, 731 and 736 are still barrier blocked behind 732 and 645. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ation 1 The assembly-level module relation is removed from this run per operator directive. Modules are re-resolved under the corrected map, conflict edges recomputed from 26 to 12, and the unstarted subgraph recolored with in-flight and merged items pinned. Items 584 and 707 carry no edge and are launched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Eight of thirteen items are merged. Items 584, 645 and 707 are in flight; 731 and 736 remain gated on 645. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… 584/752/751 - Items 645 and 707 reached READY FOR PR; created PR 755 and PR 756 against main from the parent, repairing a delegation_receipts namespace defect and a step8_status precondition in 707's own checkpoint along the way. - Admitted item 752 via /parallel-add: preparation (research/spec/plan, 4-round preflight clearance) was already complete on disk from an earlier attempt; derived its blast radius under the corrected single-module config, widened it with one exact path the extractor missed, and found conflicts only against already-merged items, so it joined the current cohort with no recolor. - Launched 584 (opus) with a resume-not-restart brief after the Opus provider incident, 752 (sonnet) for its first execution pass reusing the prep-752 worktree, and a from-scratch preparation-mode child for 751 (sonnet).
- Merged PR 755 (item 645, merge commit 495b012) and PR 756 (item 707, merge commit 35583f7) after both went BEHIND, were updated against main, and re-confirmed green on their new heads. - Nine of fifteen items now merged. Deferred worktree removal for 645 and 707 (both dirty; never forced). - Re-evaluated the per-edge barrier: item 731's conflicting prior-cohort neighbours (645, 729) are both merged, so it became eligible and was launched (opus, C4). Item 736 remains blocked on 731.
- Item 751's preparation-mode child (issue, spec, research, plan, 5-round preflight clearance) reported DONE with complexity_band C3. Derived its blast radius, found conflicts only against already-merged 729, admitted it into current cohort 2 with no recolor, and launched its execution pass (opus, per the corrected fable_policy). - Applied the operator's fable_policy correction: config/orchestration- routing.json's configured default is available, not the orchestrate skill's absent-marker default disabled. All future delegations now carry model_budget.fable_policy: available.; no live child was relaunched solely for this correction.
Merged item 751 (merge commit 8642d42) after updating its branch against advanced main and re-confirming all five required checks green on the new head. Ten of fifteen items now merged. Worktree removal deferred (dirty tree from re-collected PR context files).
…ll 15 items terminal
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Document the
bugs-2026-09-02parallel execution plan and terminal statusSummary
docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/that captures the parallel bugs run as a durable manifest, kickoff record, and status tracker.parallel.mdas the primary run document for thebugs-2026-09-02parallel effort.parallel-kickoff.mdto preserve the initial kickoff artifact for the run.parallel-status.mdand update it across the branch history to reflect PR openings, merges, issue-close events, launches, and the final terminal state noted in the latest commit.Why
bugs-2026-09-02parallel run, beginning with a run manifest and kickoff artifact and then repeatedly regenerating status as individual items progressed.What Changed
Core behavior / architecture
docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel.mdas the main run manifest for the parallel bugs effort.docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel-kickoff.mdas the kickoff artifact.docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel-status.mdas the status document that reflects ongoing run-state changes across the branch history.Tooling / automation / CI / DevEx
Tests
Docs / templates / agents
Architecture / How It Fits Together
docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel.mddocs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel-kickoff.mddocs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel-status.mdFlow through the branch:
Verification
Completed
pr_context.summary.txt).Recommended
docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel.md.docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel-kickoff.md.docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel-status.md.Backward Compatibility / Migration Notes
Risks and Mitigations
Risk: The status document can become stale if the branch state changes after the latest regeneration.
Risk: Reviewers may over-interpret this branch as product-code work.
Risk: The absence of recorded verification evidence may leave uncertainty about whether any repo-level validation was run.
Review Guide
docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel.mdto understand the primary run manifest and overall structure.docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel-kickoff.mdnext to understand the initial state captured for the run.docs/features/parallel/bugs-2026-09-02/parallel-status.mdlast to confirm the branch's recorded operational progression and final state.Follow-ups
GitHub Auto-close
Related issues / PRs