feat: add cross-spawn replacement - #900
Merged
Merged
Conversation
gameroman
suggested changes
Aug 9, 2026
gameroman
left a comment
gameroman
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should probably add an additional explanation for migrating from it
Contributor
|
agreed, it should have a may also be worth noting in there that you may not need it at all. e.g. if you're only targeting linux or something |
Contributor
Author
|
Updated the documentation with the |
43081j
reviewed
Aug 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🔗 Linked issue
Closes #887
📚 Description
Maps
cross-spawnto the existingtinyexecreplacement.tinyexecprovides the same core functionality with a smaller, dependency-free implementation.