Skip to content

Mbaluda next#1149

Draft
mbaluda wants to merge 144 commits into
mainfrom
mbaluda-next
Draft

Mbaluda next#1149
mbaluda wants to merge 144 commits into
mainfrom
mbaluda-next

Conversation

@mbaluda

@mbaluda mbaluda commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

please enter the description of your change here

Change request type

  • Release or process automation (GitHub workflows, internal scripts)
  • Internal documentation
  • External documentation
  • Query files (.ql, .qll, .qls or unit tests)
  • External scripts (analysis report or other code shipped as part of a release)

Rules with added or modified queries

  • No rules added
  • Queries have been added for the following rules:
    • rule number here
  • Queries have been modified for the following rules:
    • rule number here

Release change checklist

A change note (development_handbook.md#change-notes) is required for any pull request which modifies:

  • The structure or layout of the release artifacts.
  • The evaluation performance (memory, execution time) of an existing query.
  • The results of an existing query in any circumstance.

If you are only adding new rule queries, a change note is not required.

Author: Is a change note required?

  • Yes
  • No

🚨🚨🚨
Reviewer: Confirm that format of shared queries (not the .qll file, the
.ql file that imports it) is valid by running them within VS Code.

  • Confirmed

Reviewer: Confirm that either a change note is not required or the change note is required and has been added.

  • Confirmed

Query development review checklist

For PRs that add new queries or modify existing queries, the following checklist should be completed by both the author and reviewer:

Author

  • Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
  • Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
  • Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
  • Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with the style guide?
  • Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
    As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
  • Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
  • Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
  • Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
  • Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

Reviewer

  • Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
  • Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
  • Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
  • Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with the style guide?
  • Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
    As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
  • Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
  • Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
  • Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
  • Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

jketema and others added 30 commits March 6, 2025 13:52
Update expected test results after frontend update
Update MISRA queries and tests after merging location tables
C++: accept new test results after QL changes
Observe that `sizeof(...)` might not occur as a dataflow node if it has a
parent node with a concrete value. That value will be a dataflow node instead.
Hence, the query has be changed to check for expressions where `sizeof(...)`
is a child of an expression with a concrete value.
Note that we now properly report the offending cast instead of the expression
that is being cast.
As it is the dataflow used by `asctime` that is relevant, and not the pointer,
use the indirect expression.
Convert a number of queries to use the new dataflow library
Update expected test results for MSC33-C
Since the new dataflow library uses use-use dataflow and not def-use dataflow,
we now need to check for definitions. Note that these queries can probably be
improved by using a dataflow configuration - possibly limited to the local
context of a function by including `DataFlow::FeatureEqualSourceSinkCallContext`
jketema and others added 22 commits February 20, 2026 17:05
Update test expectations after switch to SoftFloat library in the extractor
This reverts commit 3bc45b8, reversing
changes made to 09d1e3a.
Reapply "Merge pull request #1042 from jketema/jketema/softfloat"
…est behavior

- Updated various QL files to replace deprecated 'DataFlow' and 'TaintTracking' imports with 'new.DataFlow' and 'new.TaintTracking'.
- Removed warnings related to deprecated modules in test expectations for affected rules.
…pecificStorage and AccessOfUndefinedMemberThroughUninitializedStaticPointer
GitHub Advanced Security started work on behalf of mbaluda June 24, 2026 21:27 View session
GitHub Advanced Security finished work on behalf of mbaluda June 24, 2026 21:28
GitHub Advanced Security started work on behalf of mbaluda June 24, 2026 21:35 View session
GitHub Advanced Security finished work on behalf of mbaluda June 24, 2026 21:36
GitHub Advanced Security started work on behalf of mbaluda June 24, 2026 22:24 View session
GitHub Advanced Security finished work on behalf of mbaluda June 24, 2026 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants