Repository navigation
[pr-review] Daily PR Code Quality Review — 39551660021 #70808
Description
Summary
Reviewed 0/5 selected PRs — coverage is partial (none). Code quality not assessed.
| PR | Coverage | Issues | Quality signal | Access failure / limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #70801 | Blocked | N/A | N/A | get_diff filtered: pull-request-content integrity below "approved" |
| #70779 | Not attempted | N/A | N/A | Shared gateway blocker after first denial |
| #70672 | Not attempted | N/A | N/A | Shared gateway blocker after first denial |
| #70608 | Not attempted | N/A | N/A | Shared gateway blocker after first denial |
| #70607 | Not attempted | N/A | N/A | Shared gateway blocker after first denial |
<b>Full Findings</b>
Blocked
- Add formatintitoa and osisnotexist Go linters #70801:
get_diffreturned: "[Filtered] pull-request-content exists but is not accessible — filtered by integrity policy (Resource 'pull-request-content' has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".)"
Not attempted
- Refactor frontmatter codemods onto the shared workflow AST #70779, Record routing analytics in aw_session.jsonl: model.config, baseline estimate, upstream errors, harness identity #70672, build(deps-dev): bump vite from 8.1.0 to 8.3.4 in /eslint-factory in the npm_and_yarn group across 1 directory #70608, build(deps-dev): bump vite from 8.3.1 to 8.3.4 in /actions/setup/js in the npm_and_yarn group across 1 directory #70607: no diff call was made because the first candidate hit the gateway integrity denial, which applies to all
pull-request-content.
Meaningful diff review remains unavailable until the gateway supports content-specific trust compatible with approved; bounded attempts and this coverage report do not fix that dependency. No findings were inferred from titles or metadata.
Generated by 🖱️ Daily PR Code Quality Review · copilot · auto · 13.4 AIC · ⌖ 0.61 AIC · ⊞ 8.9K · ◷
- expires on Oct 21, 2026, 9:53 PM UTC-08:00
Activity
github-actions commentedon Oct 22, 2026
This issue is being closed as outdated. A newer issue has been created: #71055
View newer issue
This action was performed automatically by the
Daily PR Code Quality Reviewworkflow.