-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
cleanup(gax-java): remove javax.annotation.Nonnull usage #13959
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -61,11 +61,7 @@ | |
| <groupId>com.google.auth</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>google-auth-library-oauth2-http</artifactId> | ||
| </dependency> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId> | ||
| <scope>provided</scope> | ||
| </dependency> | ||
|
Comment on lines
-64
to
-68
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. qq, why is this dep removed?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Since we migrated the codebase to JSpecify, we removed all references to the javax.annotation packages (which are provided by the JSR-305 / jsr305 dependency). Leaving this dependency declared would trigger an "unused declared dependency" warning!
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ok, got it. Can you add a note to the PR description why this isn't a breaking change and why we removed it? I think this should be fine since this is provided scope and won't be part of the customer's dependency tree from this jar
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, updated the PR message! |
||
|
|
||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>org.graalvm.sdk</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>nativeimage</artifactId> | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.