Update Rust to nightly-2026-08-11

[hash-dependencies]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change	Pending
rust (source, changelog)	toolchain	patch	nightly-2026-08-03 → nightly-2026-08-11	nightly-2026-08-25 (+13)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview	Aug 25, 2026 12:39am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Aug 25, 2026 12:39am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Aug 25, 2026 12:39am
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Aug 25, 2026 12:39am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single-line toolchain pin update with no application logic changes; main risk is possible nightly compiler or tool regressions.

Overview
Bumps the pinned Rust toolchain in rust-toolchain.toml from nightly-2026-08-03 to nightly-2026-08-11. The same component set (rustfmt, clippy, llvm-tools, miri, rust-src, rust-analyzer, rustc-codegen-cranelift) is unchanged.

CI, Docker builds, and local installs that read rust-toolchain.toml will pick up the newer nightly on the next toolchain install.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 69bcc88. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.95%. Comparing base (f8d59a0) to head (69bcc88).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9250   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.94%   59.95%           
=======================================
  Files        1427     1427           
  Lines      139949   139949           
  Branches     6595     6595           
=======================================
+ Hits        83898    83901    +3     
+ Misses      54977    54974    -3     
  Partials     1074     1074           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	14.66% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	12.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	2.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.24% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	12.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authentication	93.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	29.33% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	46.78% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.98% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	79.82% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 29.31%

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 95 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	runtime	29.7 ns	58.9 ns	-49.53%
❌	constant	29.7 ns	58.9 ns	-49.53%
⚡	pattern_match_constant	209.2 ns	150.8 ns	+38.67%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing deps/rust-1.x (69bcc88) with main (f8d59a0)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (02c0045) during the generation of this report, so f8d59a0 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[cursor]

Mise lockfile left on old nightly

High Severity

rust-toolchain.toml now pins nightly-2026-08-06, but .config/mise/mise.lock still records nightly-2026-08-03. mise reads the toolchain file (idiomatic_version_file_enable_tools) and CI runs mise install --locked, so the lockfile is stale relative to the requested toolchain and install can fail or resolve the old compiler.

 

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 940a5db. Configure here.}

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

There are 2 total unresolved issues (including 1 from previous review).

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 29f265f. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.867 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.661 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$23.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.307 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.966 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.470 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.773 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.492 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.950 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$41.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.840 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$36.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 899 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$41.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.598 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.534 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$40.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.248 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$91.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 595 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.663 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.617 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$253 \mathrm{ms} \pm 970 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.369 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.347 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.729 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.275 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.853 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.214 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.462 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.491 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.524 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.204 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.176 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.786 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 658 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$64.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$82.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.099 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 625 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$71.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$49.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$58.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 377 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$132 \mathrm{ms} \pm 575 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 577 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$18.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$557 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.29 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph