[ukimsanov]

What

• hyperframes (the CLI package) gets the description "Make videos with code and AI agents: write HTML, render MP4. Open source." and 14 keywords. It had none. mcp is left out because the CLI ships no MCP server.
• README: one line for people who use coding agents (npx hyperframes skills update, then ask for a video).
• context7.json: context7 (the docs index agents query) reads only docs, skills, registry and examples. Today it also indexes 583 test-fixture files: the repo entry shows 21,755 snippets at "Medium" reputation. It also hands agents five composition rules taken from AGENTS.md. Claiming the library and merging our three context7 entries happens on context7.com, outside this PR.
• The AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md that init writes opens with one line saying what the folder is, and lists snapshot --at 1,3,5.

Why

A clean Claude Code (no skills, no MCP, no user config) got 16 neutral "make a video" prompts over 20 runs. It picked HyperFrames 0 times and Remotion 3 times, and hand-built an HTML → headless Chrome → ffmpeg renderer 11 times. It ran no web searches, so it chose from memory and from what was on the machine. This PR won't change the memory part soon. It's cheap hygiene for the part we control: npm search and the files an agent reads in a project.

Proposed separately, needs repo admin: gh repo edit heygen-com/hyperframes --add-topic claude-code --add-topic ai-agents --add-topic video-editor --add-topic codex --add-topic cursor --add-topic html-to-video --add-topic motion-graphics --add-topic remotion-alternative

No visible change

Package metadata, one README line, the scaffolded agent notes and a context7 config. No UI.

Test plan

• init.test.ts 37/37
• lefthook: lint, format, fallow, typecheck, commitlint

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated
hyperframes	🟢 Ready	View Preview	Oct 22, 2026, 6:32 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Automations to automatically generate PRs for you.

[github-actions]

Edit accuracy: accurate 271 (base branch 271), smooth 161 of those

The gate passes.
Smoothness is reported in the artifact, not gated. A case fails only if it fails 2 of 3 runs.

Quarantined, measured but not gated (0)

Unstable (2)

• seqplainkeys-none-px-r0-root-z100: tracking 0.06, pressJump 0, drop 0, reload 0, render 0.03, renderKey -, undo false, teleport true / tracking 0.06, pressJump 0, drop 0, reload 0, render 0.03, renderKey -, undo true, teleport true / tracking 0.06, pressJump 0, drop 0, reload 0, render 0.03, renderKey -, undo true, teleport true
• seqplainkeys-none-pct-r0-root-z100: tracking 0.06, pressJump 0, drop 0, reload 0, render 0.03, renderKey -, undo false, teleport true / tracking 0.06, pressJump 0, drop 0, reload 0, render 0.03, renderKey -, undo true, teleport true / tracking 0.06, pressJump 0, drop 0, reload 0, render 0.03, renderKey -, undo true, teleport true

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[jrusso1020]

The CLI package change is limited to its description and 14 unique keywords; it does not claim an MCP server. The shared AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md templates remain byte-identical, init copies both, and the added snapshot --at 1,3,5 example matches the command parser.

context7.json validates against the official Context7 schema, including all five rules within the 255-character limit. Its include/exclude settings and agent guidance are consistent with the intended documentation scope. This does not prove that Context7 has reindexed or improved retrieval; account claiming, reindexing, repository topics and the reported model evaluation were not exercised.

No package publish, full init run, full CLI suite or live model evaluation was performed. Prior review was only a Copilot quota notice.

Verdict: COMMENT
Reasoning: No code blocker found in metadata, indexing configuration or the small documentation additions. Approval needs James’s go or a trusted stamper’s request.
— hf-review

[jrusso1020]

Approval at exact head bdeb3672120b04c993eaede61fe35d9ce6d56977, unchanged since my code review. James directly authorized approval in the originating Slack thread; no new code findings were added in the refreshed review/comment history.

Package metadata, Context7 configuration and identical init agent templates read clean. Context7 schema validation passes and snapshot syntax matches the parser.

Validation and limits: Schema/source controls; no Context7 reindex, package publish, model evaluation or full init run.

Verdict: APPROVE
Reasoning: The reviewed code remains clear under the stated scope and collection contract; earlier blocking findings are resolved where applicable. No merge, deployment or publication performed by me.
— hf-review

[jrusso1020]

Re-approving at 5ca18fa after the merge from main. The PR diff against main has exactly the same added and removed lines as the diff I approved at bdeb367. The only differences are context and hunk offsets from the two resolved conflicts (version bump, template heading rename). Same 6 files and no new code. James authorized approval of this PR earlier, and that still applies.