Skip to content

ci: give dtolnay/rust-toolchain a valid toolchain input - #219

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
ci/rust-toolchain-input
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
ci/rust-toolchain-input

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What was wrong

dtolnay/rust-toolchain@v1 declares toolchain as required with no default (only branches like @stable supply one). Affected steps either set none ('toolchain' is a required input), set an invalid value (v1), or carry a second with: key injected above the real one by an earlier bulk edit. A duplicate key makes GitHub reject the whole workflow file.

Changes

Each affected step now has exactly one with: and a valid toolchain.

  • cargo-audit.yml, coverage.yml, release.yml: drop the injected duplicate with:/toolchain: v1 (the real toolchain: stable stays).
  • e2e.yml: v1 → stable on one step; add toolchain: stable to three others.
  • chapel-ci.yml: v1 → stable on one step; add it to another.

Not fixed here

cargo-audit.yml, chapel-ci.yml, coverage.yml, e2e.yml and release.yml are also blocked by older actions.lock mismatches (actions bumped without regenerating the lock). GitHub won't start them until the lock is regenerated; that is separate and unchanged.

Testing

YAML parses; standards' check-lock-sync.sh reports no new failures.


Generated by Claude Code

dtolnay/rust-toolchain at @v1 (and at its master-branch commits)
declares `toolchain` as required with no default; only the
toolchain-named branches such as @stable supply one. Steps here either:

- set no `toolchain:` at all, so the action fails with "'toolchain' is a
  required input";
- set an invalid value (v1, master, or a note), which rustup cannot
  install; or
- carry a second `with:` key injected above the real one by an earlier
  bulk edit. A duplicate key makes GitHub reject the whole workflow file.

Each affected step now has exactly one `with:` with a valid toolchain:
an injected toolchain-only `with:` block is dropped, an invalid value
becomes `stable`, and a step with none gets `toolchain: stable`. An
existing valid value ('1.97.0', ${{ env.RUST_VERSION }}, stable) is
kept as is.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0132Cdz3iwk2QGKv2sUhhsye
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 51 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 77e79338-cf7b-4e91-8cf1-52ae6ad06d62
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df3d7ff and b0e2f99.

📒 Files selected for processing: 5
  • .github/workflows/cargo-audit.yml
  • .github/workflows/chapel-ci.yml
  • .github/workflows/coverage.yml
  • .github/workflows/e2e.yml
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2026 17:20
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-10-19T17:20:40.357824Z 3e6e542 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath enabled auto-merge (squash) October 19, 2026 17:20
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add Carrot credits or activate Agent usage billing to use Autofix

Signed-off-by: Jonathan D.A. Jewell <6759885+hyperpolymath@users.noreply.github.com>
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 8955f61 into main Oct 20, 2026
53 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the ci/rust-toolchain-input branch October 20, 2026 01:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants