[29.x] [CH] When posting with FCY, VAT G/L Entry stores VAT base amount in Source Currency Amount instead of VAT amount - #11269
Open
dcenic wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[29.x] [CH] When posting with FCY, VAT G/L Entry stores VAT base amount in Source Currency Amount instead of VAT amount#11269dcenic wants to merge 1 commit into
dcenic wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…res VAT base amount in Source Currency Amount instead of VAT amount
ventselartur
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When posting with FCY, VAT G/L Entry stores VAT base amount in Source Currency Amount instead of VAT amount
What & why
During initialization of a system-generated G/L Entry, not recalculating source currency amounts, as it already carries the correct source currency amount.
Linked work
Fixes AB#649597
How I validated this
What I tested and the outcome (required — be specific: scenarios, commands, screenshots for UI changes)
automated test
Risk & compatibility