Skip to content

docs(bun): fix LICENSE links in README - #2263

Merged
dinwwwh merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/amazing-johnson-e3x5k7
Oct 18, 2026
Merged

dinwwwh merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/amazing-johnson-e3x5k7

Conversation

@dinwwwh

@dinwwwh dinwwwh commented Oct 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The badge link and the License section in packages/bun/README.md pointed to blob/main/LICENCE, which 404s. The repository file is LICENSE.

Checked with pnpm docs:validate and pnpm lint.


Generated by Claude Code

The README linked to `LICENCE`, but the repository file is `LICENSE`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WSQVUBB5qjurdKhqBiJpBH
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with  Cloudflare Workers  Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status Name Latest Commit Preview URL Updated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
orpc 40c83db Commit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Oct 18 2026, 08:52 AM

@pullfrog pullfrog Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ No new issues found.

Reviewed changes

  • LICENSE link fix — corrects the badge anchor (packages/bun/README.md:10) and the License section link (packages/bun/README.md:185) from the 404ing blob/main/LICENCE to blob/main/LICENSE.

Verified the repo root contains LICENSE (not LICENCE) and that no other repo Markdown files still carry the misspelled link — the only remaining occurrences are in third-party node_modules READMEs, which are out of scope.

Pullfrog  | View workflow run | Using deepseek-v4.1-flash (free via Pullfrog for OSS) | 𝕏

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-new Bot commented Oct 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
More templates

@orpc/ai-sdk

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/ai-sdk@2263

@orpc/arktype

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/arktype@2263

@orpc/bun

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/bun@2263

@orpc/client

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/client@2263

@orpc/cloudflare

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/cloudflare@2263

@orpc/contract

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/contract@2263

@orpc/experimental-effect

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/experimental-effect@2263

@orpc/evlog

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/evlog@2263

@orpc/hibernation

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/hibernation@2263

@orpc/json-schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/json-schema@2263

@orpc/experimental-lock

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/experimental-lock@2263

@orpc/experimental-msw

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/experimental-msw@2263

@orpc/nest

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/nest@2263

@orpc/next

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/next@2263

@orpc/node

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/node@2263

@orpc/openapi

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/openapi@2263

@orpc/opentelemetry

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/opentelemetry@2263

@orpc/pinia-colada

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/pinia-colada@2263

@orpc/pino

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/pino@2263

@orpc/publisher

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/publisher@2263

@orpc/ratelimit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/ratelimit@2263

@orpc/server

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/server@2263

@orpc/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/shared@2263

@orpc/swr

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/swr@2263

@orpc/tanstack-query

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/tanstack-query@2263

@orpc/trpc

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/trpc@2263

@orpc/valibot

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/valibot@2263

@orpc/zod

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@orpc/zod@2263

commit: 40c83db

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@dinwwwh
dinwwwh merged commit f8504ba into main Oct 18, 2026
11 checks passed
@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Oct 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ 5 benchmarks spent significant time in system calls

System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.

Measurement and system calls

✅ 28 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 2 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing claude/amazing-johnson-e3x5k7 (40c83db) with main (eed2b14)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants