-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
fix: thread safety issues #614
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
leakonvalinka
wants to merge
6
commits into
open-feature:main
Choose a base branch
from
leakonvalinka:fix/thread-safety-adjustments
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
793123b
fix: thread-safety issues
leakonvalinka d1e88b7
minor corrections
leakonvalinka 67b5fc4
add explanation comment
leakonvalinka 5d11dbc
remove leftover files
leakonvalinka 22d9583
lint fixes
leakonvalinka 027a326
implement feedback
leakonvalinka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ | ||
| import threading | ||
|
|
||
| from openfeature.evaluation_context import EvaluationContext | ||
| from openfeature.transaction_context.context_var_transaction_context_propagator import ( | ||
| ContextVarsTransactionContextPropagator, | ||
|
|
@@ -21,25 +23,28 @@ | |
| _evaluation_transaction_context_propagator: TransactionContextPropagator = ( | ||
| NoOpTransactionContextPropagator() | ||
| ) | ||
| _propagator_lock = threading.RLock() | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def set_transaction_context_propagator( | ||
| transaction_context_propagator: TransactionContextPropagator, | ||
| ) -> None: | ||
| global _evaluation_transaction_context_propagator | ||
| _evaluation_transaction_context_propagator = transaction_context_propagator | ||
| with _propagator_lock: | ||
| _evaluation_transaction_context_propagator = transaction_context_propagator | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def clear_transaction_context_propagator() -> None: | ||
| set_transaction_context_propagator(NoOpTransactionContextPropagator()) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def get_transaction_context() -> EvaluationContext: | ||
| return _evaluation_transaction_context_propagator.get_transaction_context() | ||
| with _propagator_lock: | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. not sure about this one here, if this is really needed or not
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same here, I tried to ask Claude but the answer was sometimes yes and sometimes no 😅 |
||
| propagator = _evaluation_transaction_context_propagator | ||
| return propagator.get_transaction_context() | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def set_transaction_context(evaluation_context: EvaluationContext) -> None: | ||
| global _evaluation_transaction_context_propagator | ||
| _evaluation_transaction_context_propagator.set_transaction_context( | ||
| evaluation_context | ||
| ) | ||
| with _propagator_lock: | ||
| propagator = _evaluation_transaction_context_propagator | ||
| propagator.set_transaction_context(evaluation_context) | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is this change needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
because of what was pointed out in the original issue:
"
AbstractProvider._on_emit(provider/__init__.py) -emit()doesif hasattr(self, "_on_emit"): self._on_emit(...)which is a TOCTOU;detach()during shutdown can delete_on_emitwhile a background thread is between the check and the call"