NO-JIRA: bump GCD Boskos leases from 2 to 7

[rochacbruno]

Summary

• Increase gcd-quota-slice concurrent leases from 2 to 7 in u-germany-northeast1
• GCD CI volume is growing and hitting the current lease limit
• Firewall rule quota is comfortable: each cluster uses ~9-10 rules, adding 5 more leases adds ~50 rules against a 200 limit with current usage at ~65

Changes

• core-services/prow/02_config/generate-boskos.py: bump gcd-quota-slice from 2 to 7
• core-services/prow/02_config/_boskos.yaml: regenerated via make boskos-config

Test plan

• Verify _boskos.yaml has 7 slices (gcd-quota-slice-0 through gcd-quota-slice-6)
• Confirm CI jobs can acquire GCD leases after merge

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Increased concurrent gcd-quota-slice leases in u-germany-northeast1 from 2 to 7.
• Added five generated quota-slice resources to support growing GCD CI volume.
• The additional leases are expected to use approximately 50 firewall rules, within the 200-rule quota.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rochacbruno: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

• Increase gcd-quota-slice concurrent leases from 2 to 7 in u-germany-northeast1
• GCD CI volume is growing and hitting the current lease limit
• Firewall rule quota is comfortable: each cluster uses ~9-10 rules, adding 5 more leases adds ~50 rules against a 200 limit with current usage at ~65

Changes

• core-services/prow/02_config/generate-boskos.py: bump gcd-quota-slice from 2 to 7
• core-services/prow/02_config/_boskos.yaml: regenerated via make boskos-config

Test plan

• Verify _boskos.yaml has 7 slices (gcd-quota-slice-0 through gcd-quota-slice-6)
• Confirm CI jobs can acquire GCD leases after merge

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: ad0d4710-8797-4146-aedd-760e5a5e1cbf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d2a11c and 8b6749f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• core-services/prow/02_config/_boskos.yaml
• core-services/prow/02_config/generate-boskos.py

---

Walkthrough

The u-germany-northeast1 gcd-quota-slice quota increases from 2 to 7. The Boskos configuration adds resource names for slices 2 through 6.

Changes

Boskos quota expansion

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Quota and resource registration core-services/prow/02_config/generate-boskos.py, core-services/prow/02_config/_boskos.yaml	The generator quota increases to 7, and the Boskos configuration adds five named resources for slices 2 through 6.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• openshift/release#83190: Modifies Boskos quota and resource allocations for a different resource pool.

Suggested reviewers: roivaz, ibm-adarsh, josecastillolema

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15

✅ Passed checks (15 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the main change: increasing GCD Boskos leases from 2 to 7.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names	✅ Passed	The PR changes only Boskos quota configuration and adds no Ginkgo test titles or test code.
Test Structure And Quality	✅ Passed	The PR changes only Boskos YAML and a Python generator; no Ginkgo test files or test constructs are present, so this test-quality check is not applicable.
Microshift Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	The patch changes only Boskos YAML and a Python quota setting; it adds no Ginkgo tests or MicroShift-incompatible test references.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	The commit changes only Boskos YAML and a Python generator; it adds no Ginkgo e2e tests or multi-node assumptions.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility	✅ Passed	The diff only changes Boskos quota configuration: five resource names and one lease-count value. It adds no deployment, operator, controller, or scheduling constraint.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract	✅ Passed	The PR changes only a Python Boskos generator and YAML; no Go OTE binary, suite setup, or process-level stdout write is present.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	The commit changes only Boskos YAML and its Python generator; it adds no Ginkgo e2e tests, IPv4 test logic, or external connectivity.
No-Weak-Crypto	✅ Passed	The six added lines only increase quota-slice names and the count; changed files contain no weak-crypto algorithms, custom crypto, or secret comparisons.
Container-Privileges	✅ Passed	The PR changes only Boskos quota configuration; added lines contain no privileged, hostPID/hostNetwork/hostIPC, SYS_ADMIN, or allowPrivilegeEscalation settings.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs	✅ Passed	The PR adds only quota resource names and a count; changed lines contain no logging calls or sensitive values, and the generator only writes YAML output.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[rochacbruno]

/cc @patrickdillon @barbacbd

[openshift-merge-bot]

[REHEARSALNOTIFIER]
@rochacbruno: no rehearsable tests are affected by this change

Note: If this PR includes changes to step registry files (ci-operator/step-registry/) and you expected jobs to be found, try rebasing your PR onto the base branch. This helps pj-rehearse accurately detect changes when the base branch has moved forward.

[patrickdillon]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: patrickdillon, rochacbruno
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign smg247 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• core-services/prow/02_config/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@rochacbruno: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.