Skip to content

chore: bump fabric8 to v7.9.0 - #3599

Open
csviri wants to merge 1 commit into
operator-framework:mainfrom
csviri:fabric8-7.9.0
Open

chore: bump fabric8 to v7.9.0#3599
csviri wants to merge 1 commit into
operator-framework:mainfrom
csviri:fabric8-7.9.0

Conversation

@csviri

@csviri csviri commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros a_meszaros@apple.com

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated underlying Kubernetes integration components to a newer supported version.
    • Maintains compatibility with the latest platform capabilities and includes upstream maintenance improvements.

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <a_meszaros@apple.com>
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 5, 2026 11:14
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from metacosm and xstefank September 5, 2026 11:14

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The change is a straightforward Maven property version bump with no additional code or configuration modifications required in this PR.

Pull request overview

Updates the Java Operator SDK build to use Fabric8 Kubernetes Client 7.9.0, keeping the project’s core Kubernetes dependency current via the root Maven property.

Changes:

  • Bumped fabric8-client.version from 7.8.0 to 7.9.0 in the root pom.xml.
File summaries
File Description
pom.xml Updates the Fabric8 Kubernetes Client version property to 7.9.0.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: c87f2357-1e7e-4e87-ac93-b22a65c6d47c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64f0e1f and e4fd032.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pom.xml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Maven fabric8-client.version property is updated from 7.8.0 to 7.9.0. This changes the Fabric8 Kubernetes client BOM and related dependency versions.

Changes

Fabric8 Client Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update Fabric8 client version
pom.xml
The fabric8-client.version property changes from 7.8.0 to 7.9.0.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to e4fd0

This updates the Fabric8 client dependency version to 7.9.0. No current merge-blocking risk is identified.

Suggested reviewers: actions-user

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the Fabric8 dependency upgrade from version 7.8.0 to 7.9.0.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants