Repository navigation
build: DEX code optimization - #5032
Conversation
ea37b6c to
1bb4116
Compare
|
Regarding proguard.cfg, should it also be removed when adding the new file? It doesn't appear to be used anywhere in the project, unless I'm missing something @jesmrec |
you're right, it's not referenced apart of very old and not maintained. The current file should be enough. Removing it. |
|
Extra updates:
|
|
New update:
|
bbaa3a9 to
a0847a5
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
…members Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
a0847a5 to
c98433e
Compare
|
After performing tests
Executed E2E tests over...
|
Signed-off-by: Jesus Recio <jrecio@izertis.com>
Related Issues
App:
ReleaseNotesViewModel.ktcreating a newReleaseNote()with String resources (if required)QA
Test plan: https://github.com/owncloud/QA/blob/android/sharing_ng/Mobile/Android/Executions/Release_4.9/DEX%20code%20optimization.md
Extra checks: #5032 (comment)