Vitest 5 - #3368
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://vitest.dev/blog/vitest-5.html
https://vitest.dev/guide/migration/
Two changes needed:
toMatchTextContent.toHaveTextContentnow requires exact text, and the button includes the icon’s “Select” title..vitest/and include it in CI artifacts. Automatic failure screenshots now go there instead of following our existingscreenshotDirectorysetting.The promised perf improvements turned out to be pretty small:
Second commit enables
fsModuleCache, as recommended byvitest doctor. Warm Node runs drop to 1.09s, about 22% faster than v4. This mainly helps local test runs.