Skip to content

free-flow-over-porous-media: Switch mapping to consistent - #944

Merged
MakisH merged 3 commits into
developfrom
fix-943
Oct 15, 2026
Merged

MakisH merged 3 commits into
developfrom
fix-943

Conversation

@MakisH

@MakisH MakisH commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes #943 by correctly configuring the mapping of pressure and velocity as consistent mapping.

Note that the system tests are passing, which I would not expect by default for such a case, even if there is some numerical tolerance. Does the mapping actually do something in these meshes, or are they identical at the interface?

Checklist

  • I added a summary of any user-facing changes (compared to the last release) in the changelog-entries/<PRnumber>.md.

@MakisH
MakisH marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2026 14:31
@MakisH MakisH self-assigned this Oct 14, 2026
@MakisH
MakisH requested a balanced review from Copilot October 14, 2026 14:32

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The functional change is correct; only minor changelog wording needs attention.

1 open finding
What changed in this PR

Updates the pressure transfer to use consistent mapping, correctly treating pressure as intensive data.

Changes:

  • Changes pressure mapping from conservative to consistent.
  • Adds a changelog entry.
File Description
free-flow-over-porous-media/​precice-config.xml Corrects the pressure mapping constraint.
changelog-entries/​944.md Documents the fix.

🧠 Review effort: Balanced


💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread changelog-entries/944.md Outdated
@Fujikawas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Does the mapping actually do something in these meshes, or are they identical at the interface?

The meshes are identical at the interface.

@MakisH
MakisH merged commit 7a0a794 into develop Oct 15, 2026
2 checks passed
@MakisH
MakisH deleted the fix-943 branch October 15, 2026 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Conservative mapping for intensive data

3 participants