You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Add the AI-needs-explanation and AI-not-acceptable labels #611
changed the title [-]Add the `ai policy comment` and `ai policy close` labels[/-][+]Add the `AI policy comment` and `AI policy close` labels[/+]on Oct 25, 2026
In python/bedevere#722 (comment) I'm suggesting AI-needs-explanation and AI-not-acceptable labels instead. If I don't hear objection by end of the day, I will proceed with these labels, and trigger the deployment of bedevere.
changed the title [-]Add the `AI policy comment` and `AI policy close` labels[/-][+]Add the `AI-needs-explanation` and `AI-not-acceptable` labels[/+]on Oct 27, 2026
For some bikeshedding, - or no? We have a mix in our existing labels. Also, maybe needs explanation - AI and not acceptable - AI? That gives us room to add other reasons in the future. It would also sort them between the needs backport ... and OS-* labels rather than just after the version number and buildbot labels, though I'm not sure how much that really matters.
No strong preference. We have been inconsistent in our labels 😅 There are needs backport to ... labels without the dash, and then there are OS-... and topic-... labels that use dash.
I'm going to go ahead with AI-... prefix for now (with dashes). We might need this mechanism on additional repos than just CPython but that's a larger work.
I ended up creating the AI-needs-explanation and AI-guidelines-not-met instead of AI-not-acceptable.
The labels are live now on the CPython repo. Bedevere will be merged and deployed soon.
Activity
zware commentedon Oct 23, 2026
For color,
#a1a1a1?[-]Add the `ai policy comment` and `ai policy close` labels[/-][+]Add the `AI policy comment` and `AI policy close` labels[/+]Mariatta commentedon Oct 27, 2026
In python/bedevere#722 (comment) I'm suggesting
AI-needs-explanationandAI-not-acceptablelabels instead. If I don't hear objection by end of the day, I will proceed with these labels, and trigger the deployment of bedevere.[-]Add the `AI policy comment` and `AI policy close` labels[/-][+]Add the `AI-needs-explanation` and `AI-not-acceptable` labels[/+]zware commentedon Oct 27, 2026
For some bikeshedding,
-or no? We have a mix in our existing labels. Also, maybeneeds explanation - AIandnot acceptable - AI? That gives us room to add other reasons in the future. It would also sort them between theneeds backport ...andOS-*labels rather than just after the version number and buildbot labels, though I'm not sure how much that really matters.I'm happy with whichever pattern you choose :)
zanieb commentedon Oct 27, 2026
I omitted the
-because that seems like the most common pattern 🤷♀️Mariatta commentedon Oct 27, 2026
No strong preference. We have been inconsistent in our labels 😅 There are
needs backport to ...labels without the dash, and then there areOS-...andtopic-...labels that use dash.Mariatta commentedon Oct 27, 2026
I'm going to go ahead with
AI-...prefix for now (with dashes). We might need this mechanism on additional repos than just CPython but that's a larger work.Mariatta commentedon Oct 27, 2026
I ended up creating the
AI-needs-explanationandAI-guidelines-not-metinstead ofAI-not-acceptable.The labels are live now on the CPython repo. Bedevere will be merged and deployed soon.