fix(sdk): drop the invoice count from the delete blocker message

[whoAbhishekSah]

When more than one invoice is unpaid, the delete blocker message now reads:

Please pay your outstanding invoices before deleting this workspace.

It used to include the number, as in "your 3 outstanding invoices". The single-invoice sentence is unchanged.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
frontier	Ready	Preview	Sep 10, 2026 6:27am UTC

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 4d11938f-79e1-422e-9faa-de702dfb80e8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c282de and e5493d9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• web/sdk/client/utils/delete-blockers.test.ts
• web/sdk/client/utils/delete-blockers.ts

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review.

---

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Updated deletion-blocker messaging for multiple unpaid invoices to use clear plural wording without displaying the invoice count.

Walkthrough

The plural unpaid-invoice blocker message no longer includes the invoice count. The related comment and test now reflect the count-free wording.

Changes

Unpaid invoice blocker wording

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update blocker message and validation web/sdk/client/utils/delete-blockers.ts, web/sdk/client/utils/delete-blockers.test.ts	The plural unpaid-invoice message and its explanatory comment no longer reference blocker counts. The test expects “Please pay your outstanding invoices before deleting this workspace.”

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to e5493

For workspaces with multiple unpaid invoices, the deletion blocker now omits the invoice count while preserving the singular message. The updated behavior is covered without remaining merge-blocking risk.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coveralls]

Coverage Report for CI Build 34445219344

Coverage remained the same at 50.229%

Details

• Coverage remained the same as the base build.
• Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
• No coverage regressions found.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

No coverage regressions found.

---

Coverage Stats

Relevant Lines:	41106
Covered Lines:	20647
Line Coverage:	50.23%
Coverage Strength:	16.0 hits per line

---

💛 - Coveralls

[whoAbhishekSah]

Closing. The screenshot that prompted this was taken from a tab still running the previous bundle. The current wording is fine as it is.