Skip to content

Update posterior gpdfit#354

Merged
VisruthSK merged 23 commits intouse-posterior-gpdfitfrom
master
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

Update posterior gpdfit#354
VisruthSK merged 23 commits intouse-posterior-gpdfitfrom
master

Conversation

@VisruthSK
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@VisruthSK VisruthSK merged commit cddb7cc into use-posterior-gpdfit Apr 14, 2026
14 checks passed
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Apr 14, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 91.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92.73%. Comparing base (23f2117) to head (a7337f8).
⚠️ Report is 34 commits behind head on use-posterior-gpdfit.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
R/print.R 91.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                   Coverage Diff                    @@
##           use-posterior-gpdfit     #354      +/-   ##
========================================================
- Coverage                 92.78%   92.73%   -0.05%     
========================================================
  Files                        31       31              
  Lines                      2992     3057      +65     
========================================================
+ Hits                       2776     2835      +59     
- Misses                      216      222       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if a7337f8 is merged into use-posterior-gpdfit:

  • ❗🐌loo_function: 1.83s -> 2.09s [+13.25%, +15.27%]
  • ❗🐌loo_matrix: 1.35s -> 1.61s [+18.17%, +19.91%]
    Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants