Skip to content

Note that first use after a storage upgrade is slow - #269

Merged
jphenow merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
document-post-upgrade-slowness
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

jphenow merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
document-post-upgrade-slowness

Conversation

@jphenow

@jphenow jphenow commented Oct 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this gets us

People who upgrade a Sprite in place to the new storage find that their first commands, file reads and app requests are slow afterwards. The page only warned about a slow first start, so the later slowness looked like something had gone wrong. Now the page tells them to expect it and that it passes.

Approach

The intro to "Upgrading in place" now covers both slow phases: the disk copy during the first start, and the slower first use while the new storage loads data it hasn't cached yet. The verification steps now open with a one-line reminder, since that's where people will notice it.

Verify by hand

Read the "Upgrading in place" section on the preview and check that the two mentions agree with each other.

Calls worth a second opinion

  • The duration is deliberately vague ("varies from Sprite to Sprite"). It depends on how much data the Sprite has and what gets accessed, so "depends on your data size" would only be partly true.
  • The page doesn't explain the mechanism (cold extent cache, metadata warm-up). Customers can't act on those details.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated
fly-io 🟢 Ready View Preview Oct 12, 2026, 2:33 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Automations to automatically generate PRs for you.

@jphenow
jphenow merged commit e251912 into main Oct 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@jphenow
jphenow deleted the document-post-upgrade-slowness branch October 12, 2026 14:35

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
staging — d0065642 Deployed Oct 12, 2026 by mintlify[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants