Skip to content

docs: add docs about mapping types#72

Open
Alex-pvl wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
java-types-mapping-doc
Open

docs: add docs about mapping types#72
Alex-pvl wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
java-types-mapping-doc

Conversation

@Alex-pvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Alex-pvl Alex-pvl commented Apr 9, 2026

Add a dedicated section to Tarantool Java SDK docs describing supported Java types for Tarantool data mapping.

I haven't forgotten about:

  • Tests
  • Changelog
  • Documentation
    • JavaDoc was written
  • Commit messages comply with the guideline
  • Cleanup the code for review. See checklist

Related issues:

@Alex-pvl Alex-pvl requested a review from dkasimovskiy April 9, 2026 11:13
@Alex-pvl Alex-pvl self-assigned this Apr 9, 2026

???+ note "Заметка"

Если вы читаете данные как `Object` (без явного целевого класса), extension-типы будут
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Можно поизучать jackson-msgpack и как он обрабатывает значения по умолчанию, особенно в части integer, byte[]/String, float/decimal (это больше про десериализацию данных), ибо был запрос в чате про то, что binary не может десериализоваться как byte[]

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Создай тогда задачку, если в этом МР не будешь писать об этом

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Добавил инфу

@Alex-pvl Alex-pvl force-pushed the java-types-mapping-doc branch from 1393f8d to cb28d1a Compare April 10, 2026 05:14
@Alex-pvl Alex-pvl requested a review from nickkkccc April 10, 2026 05:15
nickkkccc
nickkkccc previously approved these changes Apr 10, 2026
@Alex-pvl Alex-pvl force-pushed the java-types-mapping-doc branch from 62c3820 to c934cd4 Compare April 10, 2026 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants