Skip to content

chore(docs): sync skills - #61

Merged
tempo-github-sts[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
automation/sync-skills/docs
Oct 19, 2026
Merged

tempo-github-sts[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
automation/sync-skills/docs

Conversation

@tempo-github-sts

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Generated from skills.json by .github/workflows/sync-skills.yml. Edit the source, not these copies.

Skill Source Change
docs tempoxyz/docs/public/SKILL.md 638d4016 → 94d33b6b

@tempo-github-sts
tempo-github-sts Bot enabled auto-merge (squash) October 19, 2026 19:36
@tempo-github-sts
tempo-github-sts Bot merged commit 3648d14 into main Oct 19, 2026
6 checks passed
@tempo-github-sts
tempo-github-sts Bot deleted the automation/sync-skills/docs branch October 19, 2026 19:37

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. This is a mechanical skill sync plus a patch version bump for the docs plugin.

What was reviewed:

  • Version consistency: 0.1.3 appears in manifest.config.ts, all four plugin manifests, registry/docs/server.json, and every matching golden fixture, and no 0.1.2 is left for docs.
  • SKILL.md changes: only description text in the section table, the summary sentence, and the example URL changed. No new instructions or new external domains were added.
  • skills.lock.json: only the commit and digest changed for the docs entry. The digest isn't a plain sha256 of the file, so it comes from the sync tooling and I couldn't check it locally.
Extended reasoning...

The change touches only the docs plugin's version string in generated manifests and golden fixtures, the vendored SKILL.md documentation text, and the lockfile pin for that skill. It touches no code paths and no security-sensitive surface: no auth, no input handling, and no new external URLs beyond the existing tempo.xyz docs mount. The repo has no CODEOWNERS file, the PR timeline has no reviewer objections, and the bug hunt ended on a dry streak with no findings. The edits are small and consistent with the generated-from-source pattern, so a human review isn't needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants