docs(issues): [#2219] define PR review processing workflow - #2220
Merged
josecelano merged 4 commits intoSep 15, 2026
Merged
josecelano merged 4 commits into
josecelano merged 4 commits into
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Warning
Copilot couldn't run its full agentic review because it didn't start before the timeout. Make sure your repository has a runner available, or add a copilot-code-review.yml file specifying one with the runs-on attribute. See the docs for more details.
Pull request overview
Adds an implementation-ready specification for Issue #2219 under EPIC #2003, defining a unified and deterministic PR review-processing workflow (plus local/CI rustfmt parity requirements) without implementing automation yet.
Changes:
- Added a new folder-style issue specification for #2219 describing scope, workflow ownership, acceptance criteria, and implementation plan.
- Registered #2219 in EPIC #2003’s “Approved Early Implementation Candidates” table.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/issues/open/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/ISSUE.md | New issue specification documenting the unified PR review-processing workflow and supporting requirements. |
| docs/issues/open/2003-overhaul-guardrails-and-automation/EPIC.md | Adds Issue #2219 to the EPIC’s approved early-candidate list. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Copilot stopped reviewing on behalf of
josecelano due to an error
September 15, 2026 09:14
josecelano
force-pushed
the
2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing-spec
branch
from
September 15, 2026 09:16
c9549f9 to
20aa241
Compare
josecelano
force-pushed
the
2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing-spec
branch
from
September 15, 2026 09:33
6095e43 to
a503cd2
Compare
Member
Author
|
ACK a503cd2 |
35 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds the implementation-ready specification for Issue #2219, an approved early implementation candidate under EPIC #2003. The issue responds to evidence from PR #2174's five maintainer review rounds and Copilot suggestions: stable/nightly rustfmt parity, rebase-stable commit citations, claim verification before resolving threads, a unified author-owned review-processing workflow, one canonical
docs/pr-reviews/parent directory, and an advisory reviewer finding format.Scope
docs/issues/open/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/Validation
cargo machete, layer-boundary bans,linter all, Containerfile lint, and documentation testsRelated to #2219