docs(issues): [#2233] add review process tuning spec - #2235
Merged
josecelano merged 3 commits intoSep 16, 2026
Merged
josecelano merged 3 commits into
josecelano merged 3 commits into
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2235 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 85.39% 85.39%
========================================
Files 353 353
Lines 31315 31315
Branches 31315 31315
========================================
+ Hits 26740 26741 +1
+ Misses 4193 4190 -3
- Partials 382 384 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Changes recommended
Address the outstanding metadata, archived-history, and verifier findings.
Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.
Pull request overview
Formalizes the #2233 review-process tuning specification, archives #2219, and updates related workflow references and validation.
Changes:
File summaries
| File | Reviewed change | Findings |
|---|---|---|
docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/ISSUE.md |
Adds the tuning specification and implementation plan. | moderate (3): use draft status; strengthen the exact zero-context diff verification. |
docs/issues/open/2003-overhaul-guardrails-and-automation/EPIC.md |
Marks #2219 complete and archived. | nit (3): retain canonical timestamp format. |
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/manual-verification-evidence.md |
Updates archived metadata and evidence references. | nit (3): retain canonical timestamp format. |
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/ISSUE.md |
Archives #2219 and updates closure metadata. | nit (3): retain canonical timestamp format; moderate (1): set related-pr to 2232. |
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/implementation-retrospective.md |
Updates archived artifact references. | No final comments. |
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/agent-review-reports.md |
Preserves archived review history. | nit (2): append the later passing report. |
contrib/dev-tools/checks/tests/test-agent-review-report-contract.sh |
Points contract validation to the archived specification. | No final comments. |
.github/skills/dev/pr-reviews/process-pr-review/SKILL.md |
Updates the canonical archived-issue reference. | No final comments. |
Review details
Suppressed comments (4)
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/ISSUE.md:11
- The archived issue's frontmatter must retain the canonical
YYYY-MM-DD HH:MMUTC format (docs/skills/semantic-skill-link-convention.md:139-151). This changed value is ISO-8601 withT, seconds, andZ; rewrite it as minute precision.
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/ISSUE.md:11 - PR #2232 is the merged PR that closes #2219, but the archived spec still leaves
related-pr: null. The cleanup metadata should retain that implementation link; setrelated-prto2232while archiving the issue.
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/manual-verification-evidence.md:4 - Supplementary issue frontmatter uses the same canonical
last-updated-utc: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MMformat (docs/skills/semantic-skill-link-convention.md:139-151). This changed ISO-8601 value should be rewritten withoutT, seconds, orZ.
docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/ISSUE.md:11 - Issue frontmatter requires
last-updated-utcinYYYY-MM-DD HH:MMUTC form (docs/skills/semantic-skill-link-convention.md:150). This ISO-8601 value withT, seconds, andZdoes not match the repository contract; use minute precision without those separators.
last-updated-utc: 2026-09-16T08:15:31Z
- Files reviewed: 7/8 changed files
- Comments generated: 3
- Review effort level: Lite
💡 Configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Member
Author
|
ACK eb7c41d |
josecelano
deleted the
2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process-spec
branch
September 16, 2026 12:06
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Validation
Related to #2233