Skip to content

docs(issues): [#2233] add review process tuning spec - #2235

Merged
josecelano merged 3 commits into
torrust:developfrom
josecelano:2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process-spec
Sep 16, 2026
Merged

josecelano merged 3 commits into
torrust:developfrom
josecelano:2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process-spec

Conversation

@josecelano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Validation

  • linter markdown
  • linter cspell
  • linter lychee
  • bash contrib/dev-tools/checks/tests/test-agent-review-report-contract.sh
  • git diff --check
  • TORRUST_GIT_HOOKS_LOG_DIR=.tmp ./contrib/dev-tools/git/hooks/pre-commit.sh --format=text

Related to #2233

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 16, 2026 10:50
@josecelano
josecelano requested a review from a team as a code owner September 16, 2026 10:50
@josecelano josecelano self-assigned this Sep 16, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.39%. Comparing base (a628b24) to head (eb7c41d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2235   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    85.39%   85.39%           
========================================
  Files          353      353           
  Lines        31315    31315           
  Branches     31315    31315           
========================================
+ Hits         26740    26741    +1     
+ Misses        4193     4190    -3     
- Partials       382      384    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

Address the outstanding metadata, archived-history, and verifier findings.

Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.

Pull request overview

Formalizes the #2233 review-process tuning specification, archives #2219, and updates related workflow references and validation.

Changes:

  • Adds the #2233 tuning specification.
  • Archives #2219 and updates metadata and supporting documents.
  • Aligns contract-test and skill references with the archived specification.
File summaries
File Reviewed change Findings
docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/ISSUE.md Adds the tuning specification and implementation plan. moderate (3): use draft status; strengthen the exact zero-context diff verification.
docs/issues/open/2003-overhaul-guardrails-and-automation/EPIC.md Marks #2219 complete and archived. nit (3): retain canonical timestamp format.
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/manual-verification-evidence.md Updates archived metadata and evidence references. nit (3): retain canonical timestamp format.
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/ISSUE.md Archives #2219 and updates closure metadata. nit (3): retain canonical timestamp format; moderate (1): set related-pr to 2232.
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/implementation-retrospective.md Updates archived artifact references. No final comments.
docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/agent-review-reports.md Preserves archived review history. nit (2): append the later passing report.
contrib/dev-tools/checks/tests/test-agent-review-report-contract.sh Points contract validation to the archived specification. No final comments.
.github/skills/dev/pr-reviews/process-pr-review/SKILL.md Updates the canonical archived-issue reference. No final comments.
Review details

Suppressed comments (4)

docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/ISSUE.md:11

  • The archived issue's frontmatter must retain the canonical YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM UTC format (docs/skills/semantic-skill-link-convention.md:139-151). This changed value is ISO-8601 with T, seconds, and Z; rewrite it as minute precision.
    docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/ISSUE.md:11
  • PR #2232 is the merged PR that closes #2219, but the archived spec still leaves related-pr: null. The cleanup metadata should retain that implementation link; set related-pr to 2232 while archiving the issue.
    docs/issues/closed/2219-2003-unify-pr-review-processing/manual-verification-evidence.md:4
  • Supplementary issue frontmatter uses the same canonical last-updated-utc: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM format (docs/skills/semantic-skill-link-convention.md:139-151). This changed ISO-8601 value should be rewritten without T, seconds, or Z.
    docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/ISSUE.md:11
  • Issue frontmatter requires last-updated-utc in YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM UTC form (docs/skills/semantic-skill-link-convention.md:150). This ISO-8601 value with T, seconds, and Z does not match the repository contract; use minute precision without those separators.
last-updated-utc: 2026-09-16T08:15:31Z
  • Files reviewed: 7/8 changed files
  • Comments generated: 3
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/ISSUE.md
Comment thread docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/ISSUE.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/issues/open/2003-overhaul-guardrails-and-automation/EPIC.md Outdated
@josecelano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

ACK eb7c41d

@josecelano
josecelano merged commit 23a68e0 into torrust:develop Sep 16, 2026
19 checks passed
@josecelano
josecelano deleted the 2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process-spec branch September 16, 2026 12:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants