chore(deps): update dependency pyarrow to v23 [security] by renovate[bot] · Pull Request #8795 · vortex-data/vortex

Performance Gate Passed

⚡ 16 improved benchmarks
✅ 1644 untouched benchmarks
🆕 10 new benchmarks
⏩ 52 skipped benchmarks¹

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]`	155.4 µs	124 µs	+25.3%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768]`	151.3 µs	122.2 µs	+23.74%
⚡	Simulation	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]`	170 µs	138.8 µs	+22.52%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384]`	96.2 µs	80.2 µs	+19.88%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 16384]`	92.8 µs	78.1 µs	+18.8%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	163.3 µs	138.2 µs	+18.16%
⚡	Simulation	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 16384]`	106.8 µs	90.9 µs	+17.48%
⚡	Simulation	`new_raw_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]`	121.5 µs	103.9 µs	+17%
⚡	Simulation	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 32768]`	178 µs	153 µs	+16.3%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]`	102 µs	89.2 µs	+14.26%
⚡	Simulation	`new_raw_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]`	114.7 µs	100.5 µs	+14.18%
⚡	Simulation	`new_raw_prim_test_between[u32, 32768]`	116.8 µs	102.4 µs	+14.13%
⚡	Simulation	`new_raw_prim_test_between[f32, 16384]`	75.2 µs	66.3 µs	+13.35%
⚡	Simulation	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384]`	113.8 µs	101.3 µs	+12.37%
⚡	Simulation	`new_raw_prim_test_between[i32, 16384]`	71.8 µs	64.6 µs	+11.1%
⚡	Simulation	`new_raw_prim_test_between[u32, 16384]`	72.9 µs	65.6 µs	+11.02%
🆕	Simulation	`collect_bool_u32_gt[1024]`	N/A	6.3 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`collect_bool_u32_gt[65536]`	N/A	205.5 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`from_bool_slice[1024]`	N/A	2.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`from_bool_slice[65536]`	N/A	40.1 µs	N/A
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing renovate/pypi-pyarrow-vulnerability (0fa318b) with develop (f742e8a)²}

52 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
No successful run was found on develop (9c69195) during the generation of this report, so f742e8a was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩