Skip to content

[do not merge] list transform array with templatearray instantiation - #9722

Draft
mhk197 wants to merge 1 commit into
mk/lambda-expressionsfrom
mk/list-transform-array
Draft

[do not merge] list transform array with templatearray instantiation#9722
mhk197 wants to merge 1 commit into
mk/lambda-expressionsfrom
mk/list-transform-array

Conversation

@mhk197

@mhk197 mhk197 commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Tracking Issue: #000

Changes

Signed-off-by: Matt Katz <mhkatz97@gmail.com>
@mhk197
mhk197 force-pushed the mk/list-transform-array branch from 08bdf27 to e265a1f Compare September 1, 2026 21:42
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 12.02%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2088 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 206 skipped benchmarks1
🗄️ 4 archived benchmarks run2

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation float_gt[16] 251.7 µs 286.3 µs -12.08%
WallTime words_gather_scalar_avx2[65536] 8.3 µs 9.4 µs -11.97%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing mk/list-transform-array (e265a1f) with mk/lambda-expressions (d8e744f)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 206 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. 4 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant