feat: add forward option when sharing assets [WPB-26687]

[MohamadJaara]

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-26687

Summary

Adds a “Share in Wire” option alongside the existing external sharing flow for logs and shared assets.

This PR builds on the zipped-log sharing work and extends the sharing UX so users can choose whether to share content inside Wire or through external apps.

Changes

• Add separate sharing actions for:
  • sharing logs via Wire
  • sharing logs externally
• Add a share-options bottom sheet for log sharing.
• Route Wire log sharing through ImportMediaScreen using shared file URIs.
• Keep external sharing behind the system chooser and exclude Wire’s own share targets.
• Introduce ImportMediaNavArgs for passing shared media URIs through navigation.
• Update asset/message/gallery sharing flows to support both Wire and external destinations.
• Rework log archive sharing helpers so zipped logs can be shared either as an external intent or as a Wire-import URI.
• Add/update tests around log zip creation and media sharing behavior.

[pull-request-size]

Ups 🫰🟨

This PR is too big. Please try to break it up into smaller PRs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 27.36318% with 146 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 49.22%. Comparing base (1e55dfd) to head (d4ad5d2).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../src/main/kotlin/com/wire/android/util/FileUtil.kt	0.00%	59 Missing ⚠️
...id/ui/sharing/ImportMediaAuthenticatedViewModel.kt	51.85%	20 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
.../com/wire/android/feature/cells/util/FileHelper.kt	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
...e/android/ui/home/gallery/MediaGalleryViewModel.kt	38.88%	11 Missing ⚠️
...kotlin/com/wire/android/util/logging/LogSharing.kt	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
...otlin/com/wire/android/ui/WireActivityViewModel.kt	76.47%	0 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...n/com/wire/android/ui/edit/ShareAssetMenuOption.kt	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
.../com/wire/android/ui/WireActivityActionsHandler.kt	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...nversations/edit/MessageOptionsModalSheetLayout.kt	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...rsations/messages/ConversationMessagesViewModel.kt	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
... and 6 more

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (27.36%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4869      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    49.31%   49.22%   -0.10%     
===========================================
  Files          650      652       +2     
  Lines        23457    23593     +136     
  Branches      3606     3642      +36     
===========================================
+ Hits         11568    11613      +45     
- Misses       10813    10893      +80     
- Partials      1076     1087      +11     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...rc/main/kotlin/com/wire/android/ui/WireActivity.kt	56.48% <ø> (ø)
.../wire/android/mapper/SystemMessageContentMapper.kt	47.30% <87.50%> (ø)
...ndroid/ui/sharing/ImportMediaAuthenticatedState.kt	87.50% <0.00%> (ø)
...kotlin/com/wire/android/util/AvatarImageManager.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...kotlin/com/wire/android/ui/MiscViewModelFactory.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ain/kotlin/com/wire/android/ui/debug/LogOptions.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../com/wire/android/ui/WireActivityActionsHandler.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...nversations/edit/MessageOptionsModalSheetLayout.kt	1.92% <0.00%> (-0.08%)	⬇️
...rsations/messages/ConversationMessagesViewModel.kt	68.42% <0.00%> (-1.00%)	⬇️
...om/wire/android/ui/userprofile/qr/QRCodeIntents.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 7 more

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1e55dfd...d4ad5d2. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
B Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE