M0 foundation razor grammar - #101
Open
joeizang wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Rebrand the extension for the fork at joeizang/zed-csharp-plus: - extension.toml: id csharp-plus, name "C# Plus", description widened to cover Razor and .NET project files, repository pointed at the fork. Upstream authors retained per the Apache-2.0 notice requirement. - Cargo.toml/Cargo.lock: crate renamed to zed_csharp_plus. - README: fork provenance (upstream 88597e1, v1.2.2), migration off the upstream "C#" extension, and the upstream-sync workflow. - BACKLOG.md: roadmap for first-class Razor editing, .NET workflow, and project-aware Razor semantics, with the fork recorded as Decision 0. LICENSE is unmodified. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014LvMtFustJGefLPHSrDRqR
|
We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have @joeizang on file. You can sign our CLA at https://zed.dev/cla. Once you've signed, post a comment here that says '@cla-bot check'. |
Milestone 0 foundation for the C# Plus fork: - Fork hygiene (D0.1): upstream-sync, versioning, and publishing docs; the upstream bump_version workflow is removed (it is gated on the zed-industries and zed-extensions owners and can never run here) and replaced by scripts/bump-version.sh. - M0.1 inventory of the inherited extension contract. - M0.3a Razor corpus: 14 well-formed and 10 pathological files. - M0.2 grammar audit and G1 decision: four candidates evaluated with scripts/grammar-fitness.py against the bands fixed in BACKLOG.md. tris203/tree-sitter-razor is forked with three named fixes; post-fix the corpus is 14/14 clean and the upstream corpus is 79/79. The grammar lives in its own repository and is pinned by commit from extension.toml, as the c_sharp and xml grammars already are.
joeizang
force-pushed
the
m0-foundation-razor-grammar
branch
from
September 6, 2026 22:26
b1a07b7 to
d3235b7
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.