Skip to content

docs: fix stale current-review routing in contribution index - #1285

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
Arham-Tahir64:codex/contribution-review-navigation
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
Arham-Tahir64:codex/contribution-review-navigation

Conversation

@Arham-Tahir64

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Readers following CONTRIBUTING.md's contribution-review link are directed to the historical #531 review as the “current checkpoint,” and to the October 11 research integration as the “latest” batch. The selected record instead resolves to the #1094 review.

This changes only the introductory routing in docs/research/contribution-review.md: follow the selected record's review, source_manifest, certificate, and reproduce fields; use the PR ledger for dispositions; keep the existing #531 and October 11 links explicitly historical. The historical body, source artifacts, attribution, and selected frontier are unchanged. No new mathematical result or κ is claimed.

Task and overlap

  • Card: scope-navigation, consolidation; scope key b18e0e173a4430a9564b, refined to this one onboarding route.
  • Allocation nonce: 94ac6e7e91dbc27dc086c41e1aa44e94; priority revision 2.
  • Base: current main dadfea6e8a78ff6ba901705f87532a71c6f5bbb8.
  • Selected-record SHA-256: 10b9e340fd8e354a37a0c4813c90e5de1dd42044b5f6aca4a3fc5a42b685fa32.
  • PR Consolidation: stop historical status sections from claiming to be current (no new kappa) #1232 at 1a0ecf7f534a67a910b7b5a7e0abe46be074c609 already addresses historical headings in current-status.md. That initial candidate was discarded; this is a separate file and incoming CONTRIBUTING link.
  • Refreshed python3 scripts/find_overlap.py 'contribution-review.md' 'direct-delivery review' --refresh: no literal matches across 871 open PRs (including drafts), 30 discussion records, and the helper's local notes/ledger coverage, at 2026-10-13 21:43 UTC. Pagination complete; arbitrary diffs and nested sources are not searched, so this is not a novelty proof.

Validation

  • python3 -B scripts/research_baseline.py: PASS_RESEARCH_BASELINE_BINDINGS_ONLY.
  • git diff --check: pass.
  • A standard-library check resolved every introductory local link and the selected record's three file targets, checked the four field names, and compared the entire historical suffix beginning The selected PR #39 chain byte-for-byte against the base: pass.
  • Verified that the diff touches only this one Markdown file. No persistent test added for this documentation-only repair; no cold supplier replay or mathematical verification claimed.

Credit Douglas Colkitt's existing contribution index and review lineage, and the adjacent navigation work in #1232. Prepared for Arham Tahir with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance. Apache-2.0.

@Mister-Meeseeks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

100-PR batch review at d9a651686fd9ba0745920f76a71d154f51ccd570.

Merged to main, preserving the original contributor commits and package attribution.

Reviewed scope: Repairs contribution-index routing: selected-result fields and the current PR ledger replace obsolete claims that PR531 is the current checkpoint.

The pinned scoped command passed; the batch ledger contains its command, input hashes, environment and log. This incorporates the research/tooling contribution and does not change the selected κ or discharge the inherited multiplication-theorem assumptions.

Batch review, attribution and evidence. Thank you for the contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants