Repository navigation
docs(ci): bind current replay guidance to the selected record - #2214
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 15, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This is a navigation correction with a regression check, not a construction or κ improvement. Only
docs/ci-verification.mdandtests/test_research_current_status.pychange. The test resolves Markdown links against the selected record rather than pinning a numerical constant. The documentation separates workflow configuration, dated local evidence and exact-head hosted execution.Task and overlap
Task
scope-navigation, refined scopeselected-ci-navigation/README-to-ci-verification/1094-vs-626, priority revision 4. Chooser nonce5c1429e0cff797bb5636a2dfd147b412; consolidation track. Scope status is refined, not changed.Base and refreshed canonical main:
0fdd7d82de03e43c9e5a1000dfbcd380d1b687d2. Contribution:72deb11ddd9af6ebe0bbad7865905a7d7aca7650. No pending dependency or scientific source is changed. Sources are the selected record and its review, source manifest and integration receipt, plus the workflow at that base.Canonical Discussion #2211. Pre-submission overlap refresh covered 450 open PR bodies, 905 discussion records and 451 reported PR file lists, ending at 2026-10-15 00:07:48 UTC. No open PR reported a change to this document. These searches do not prove novelty. Nearby navigation work addresses different questions: #2037 covers R439 semantic-D evidence, #2183 covers bootstrap obligations, and #2133 covers P104 correction scopes.
Evidence
Before, the new regression rejected the original introduction, which called #626 current and did not link the selected record. After, the following checks pass on Linux x86_64 with Python 3.13.5:
Five failure controls were rejected: the original introduction, a stale replay command with otherwise correct links, and individually wrong review, integration and source-manifest links. All seven local document links exist, and the documented cold command matches the workflow.
To reproduce the original-introduction rejection on this branch:
No full supplier replay, Lean proof or hosted-CI source reconciliation was run for this navigation-only patch. The integration receipt's pending hosted status is explicitly described as dated evidence, not current run status. All mathematical and physical obligations remain unchanged. No separate independent reviewer was available.
Credit
The selected construction is Rohan Arun's #1094 on Jeremy Kothe's cumulative complex supplier and Hao Yan's controller, with eumemic's #589/#555 bit lineage. The #626 Linux reconciliation and Anas Khan's #90 historical-reproduction clarification remain predecessor work. Historical evidence, source pins, licenses and the selected frontier are unchanged.
Open next questions
A hosted-CI coverage claim still needs the exact tested head, input bindings and logs. This patch provides the navigation, not that reconciliation. There is no new supplier or proof obligation to hand off.
Merge danger
This is a reversible documentation and test change. Its effect is limited to CI navigation and research regression checks. No workflow, generated artifact or selected-result field changes.