Skip to content

No inserted carrier correction legalizes a PR5718-shape leak class on the PR6030 P104 word (no new κ) - #6045

Open
JosieElliston wants to merge 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
JosieElliston:s33-pr5718-leak-correction
Open

JosieElliston wants to merge 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
JosieElliston:s33-pr5718-leak-correction

Conversation

@JosieElliston

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Result (scoped exact result, no new κ)

This takes step (3) that #6040 released: output corrections at later meetings for the PR5718-shape leak classes. It runs on the #6030 word (κ .003125804; selected at main 721c03822 during this session, inputs unchanged) and on the #5907 word. The package is research/p104-pr5718-leak-correction.

Word Leak classes Carrier sources Legalized by an inserted carrier correction
PR6030 4,033 0 0
PR5907 4,206 0 0
  • The non-z part decides. In the split word each field holds orig_f + β_f (z − ℓ), where ℓ = row_p(i)·X is the retired value. So the defect outside V is the rank-one d_O ⊗ (z − ℓ), not just the z-leak d_O. A correction from a pure multiple of the new helper (Census PR5718-shape helper splits on the PR5907 word: none remain without a mid-word correction (no new κ) #6040's suggested r += q·new) only adds multiples of z. It therefore cannot clear the defect, with any number of corrections. The z-part alone is easy: in a local full run on Conditional κ .003125804 (+5.22e-7 over #5907): remove helper 470's frame-593 rung, the twin of #5907's removal #6030 it passes in 2,071 of 4,033 classes.
  • A single correction needs a carrier. For one inserted chart-local ADD/SCALE to clear the defect, its source must be a carrier: zero in the original word but carrying the cut content (β ≠ 0). Any program built only from carrier sources needs a first carrier in the uncorrected word.
  • No carrier exists. On both words, no field at any event after any cut is a carrier, in any leak class. So every leak class is excluded for single corrections and for carrier-only programs.
  • Positive control. On the PR5713 word, a carrier and a leak planted after PR5718's own cut are found. An independent simulator (check.py) accepts the found correction with no defect outside V, and rejects a perturbed coefficient.

Verification

python3.12 -B research/p104-pr5718-leak-correction/verify.py           # ~90 s, PASS_P104_PR5718_LEAK_CORRECTION
python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/p104-pr5718-leak-correction

All of these passed locally on macOS with Python 3.12: normal, -I -O, --check-only and the registered replay. CI was not watched.

Scope and remaining obligations

Credit

Claim: #1166 (reply in thread)

Prepared for JosieElliston by Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) via Claude Code, as one session of an unattended overnight run.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

JosieElliston and others added 2 commits October 27, 2026 22:47
…k class on the PR6030 P104 word (no new κ)

Takes PR6040's released step (3). Exact census over all 4,033 PR6030 and 4,206
PR5907 leak classes: no carrier source exists, so no single inserted ADD/SCALE
and no carrier-only correction program clears the defect outside V; pure-z
corrections never clear it. Planted positive control on the PR5713 word.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant