Repository navigation
Conversation
…/final-frame-composition
|
Thank you @rohanarun. This contribution is now recorded on main in the scoped reconciliation review and contributor credits. Contribution: Coordinate pricing with the baseline legal engine. Review and limits: Exact-head CI evidence. The long-cycle search accepted zero candidates; retained as a scoped negative experiment. The complete original source, proof/research notes, notices and relevant replay/CI evidence are retained through the pinned source archive. The review distinguishes fresh runs, exact-head historical CI and prior integration evidence. Closing this historical PR as reconciled; its obsolete headline does not replace the current selected bound, and draft/retracted claims retain their explicit qualifications. Reviewed head: |
Under the inherited analytic and fixed finite-alphabet multitape hypotheses,
This is a small 0.0006927669% improvement over #95, with bit saving
6599281088677/125000000000000000.Current comparison: #97, opened while this was being published, reports the higher conditional κ = 6.3965813×10⁻⁵ using deferred bit endpoints and a signed complex schedule. This PR is an incremental improvement to the PR95 construction, not a record claim.
At h25, price legal carrier choices in the final coordinate order, including #93 and #95's later relabelings. Previously the producer made these choices using an earlier coordinate order. The unchanged compiler, with this existing parameter updated, reproduces the selected new physical word byte-for-byte. h23 remains #95's word.
Roles remain 26,387 / 34,772, width 130,417,912, and total recursive rank 74,988,452,500. The complete internal child distribution changes. Every exterior, center-copy charge, side-growth contribution and early/late restoration gate remains paid; the bridge and complex layer are unchanged.
Full verification passed:
make -j1 verify(92 isolated test modules, 20 historical patch checks), both parent control suites, full inherited producer-chain regeneration and six own controls completed in 6,633.390 seconds onf07c7db7d1fd378b0deae68e33b53421456319ae. All 57 research-head GitHub checks passed; no source drift. The committed validation receipt records the commands, timestamps and evidence hashes. Subsequent changes only add that receipt and update package documentation and its fingerprint.Checks:
The package contains the general parameter-transfer argument, full paid accounting, source pins and a Python 3.11/3.13/3.14 workflow. This candidate emerged from the completed 16-experiment exchange batch, but no long cycles were accepted: the gain is from coordinate-aware pricing alone. No search optimality, new Lean proof or practical speedup is claimed. All inherited all-size and analytic hypotheses remain assumptions.
Credit Chafik Boukhalfa (#91), Maxime Fleury with Codebuff assistance (#94), Rohan Arun (#93/#95 and geometric pricing), Alejandro Zarzuelo Urdiales, Thomas DiFiore, Dominik Scholz, eumemic, Avi Eisenberg, Rohan Garg, icekylinx, James Chang, Zhihao Chen, Aurel Prosz/Paureel, Swapnil Jain, RaD/hipotures, Douglas Colkitt, OpenAI and all predecessors. Original code and notices are preserved.
Prepared by Rohan Arun with OpenAI Codex assistance.