Port PiecewiseSequence run-take consumers#8802
Draft
danking wants to merge 9 commits into
Draft
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
failed
Jul 17, 2026 in 0s
2 benchmarks regressed
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1792 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 52 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | copy_nullable[65536] |
1 ms | 1.4 ms | -24.24% |
| ❌ | Simulation | copy_non_nullable[65536] |
908.9 µs | 1,089.5 µs | -16.57% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | struct_large |
431.9 µs | 39.1 µs | ×11 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | fsl_large |
615.7 µs | 89.2 µs | ×6.9 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | list_i32_large |
172.8 µs | 107.8 µs | +60.32% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | i32_large |
277.8 µs | 238 µs | +16.71% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing codex/piecewise-sequential-run-take-consumers (490e9db) with codex/piecewise-sequential-take (c94c4ef)
Footnotes
-
52 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
Loading